期刊文献+

格林布拉特《隐形的子弹》之洞见与盲视 被引量:1

Insights and Blindness in Greenblatt's“Invisible Bullets”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《隐形的子弹》一文是格林布拉特新历史主义批评的代表性论文,但一直以来,他在文中提出的批评假设和使用的批评方法的洞见和盲视还没有得到充分的讨论。从这两个层面来重新审视格林布拉特的这篇代表作,一方面从批评假设的层面厘清它关于文艺复兴时期权力的颠覆与抑制模式的术语之间的关系以及现代早期文化中权力及冲突之间动态结构的关系,另一方面,从操作的层面揭示它逸闻主义式论证方法的有效性和缺陷。如此,在文学批评新的范式转换之际,才能更明确应如何继承与发展"新历史主义"。 "Invisible Bullets" is arguably Greenblatt's most important new historicist practice. However, the insights and blindness in his critical assumptions and methodology have not been adequately dis- cussed. This essay thus attempts to rethink Greenblatt's new historicism through "Invisible Bullets" both theoretically and practically. On the one hand, it clarifies the subversion/containment mode he pro- posed in relation to each other, to the dynamics of power, and to the conflict in renaissance culture~ on the other hand, it reexamines the anecdotism Greenblatt used to present his arguments to determine its validity and reveal its blindness. Thus we will be in a better position to assess the legacy of new histori- cism in a time of paradigm shift.
作者 朱静
出处 《河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第4期40-44,共5页 Journal of Hebei University(Philosophy and Social Science)
基金 2011年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目<格林布拉特的新历史主义研究>(11YJC752042)
关键词 格林布拉特 新历史主义 《隐形的子弹》 颠覆与抑制 逸闻主义 Greenblatt new historicism "Invisible Bullets" subversion/containment anecdotism
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1HARRIOT, THOMAS. A Briefe and True Report of the New Found Land of Virginia EEB/OL~. E2015-- 01 -- 151. http ://digitaleommons. unl. edu/etas/20.
  • 2威廉·莎士比亚.亨利四世:上篇[M].莎士比亚全集:第三部.朱生豪,等,译.北京:人民文学出版社,2014:14.
  • 3DOLLIMORE, JONATHAN. Alan Sinfield. Political Shakespeare [C]. Ithaca and London: Cornell Univer- sity, 1994: 12--14.
  • 4WILSON, RICHARD. 'Is This a Holiday.'?' : Shake- speare's Roman Carnival[J].ELH, 1987(54) : 39.
  • 5HOY, DAVID. Power, Repression, Progress= Fou- eault, Lukes, and the Frankfurt School [C]// HOY DAVID COUZENS . Foucault.. A Critical Reader. Oxford : B!.aekwell, 1986 : 140 -- 145.
  • 6LEINWAND, THEODORE B. Negotiation and New Historicism [J].PMLA, 1990,105(3): 479.
  • 7BRUSTER, DOUGLAS. Shakespeare and the Ques- tion of Culture [M]. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003 : 29.
  • 8马基雅维利.论李维[M].冯克利,译.上海:上海世纪出版集团·上海人民出版社,2005.
  • 9BARTON, ANNE. Perils of Historieism [EB/OL]. E2015- 01- 251. http..//www, nybooks, corn/arti- cles/3309.
  • 10COHEN, WALTER. Political Criticism of Shake- speare [C] // HOWARD JEAN E, MARION F O' CANNOR. Shakespeare Reproduced: The Text in History and Ideology. New York: Methuen, 1987, reprinted in 2005 by Routledge: 34.

共引文献15

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部