期刊文献+

TOWARDS AVOIDING THE HIDDEN TRAPS IN QFD DURING REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHMENT 被引量:4

TOWARDS AVOIDING THE HIDDEN TRAPS IN QFD DURING REQUIREMENTS ESTABLISHMENT
原文传递
导出
摘要 The Quality Function Deployment (QFD) is a useful and representative methodology to transform customer needs into different level of requirements in a system hierarchy. Simplifications that are based on assumptions are ubiquitous in the QFD, but these underlying assumptions possibly do not hold true, which renders the simplifications unjustified. Additionally, these assumptions are usually not verified within the context of the application domain. This paper identifies and illustrates eight hidden traps in QFD during the process of establishing the requirements, where the assumptions, and therefore, the simplifications made are not reasonable. These traps are implicit in the understanding of customer needs, establishment of system requirements and the flow down of these requirements to lower levels of the system hierarchy. Suggestions are given to help avoiding these hidden traps, thereby eliminating or alleviating their potentially detrimental effects. The intent of the paper is to make readers aware of these traps when applying QFD for the establishment of requirements, so that they may utilize QFD with a better understanding of its limitations and develop higher quality specifications. The Quality Function Deployment (QFD) is a useful and representative methodology to transform customer needs into different level of requirements in a system hierarchy. Simplifications that are based on assumptions are ubiquitous in the QFD, but these underlying assumptions possibly do not hold true, which renders the simplifications unjustified. Additionally, these assumptions are usually not verified within the context of the application domain. This paper identifies and illustrates eight hidden traps in QFD during the process of establishing the requirements, where the assumptions, and therefore, the simplifications made are not reasonable. These traps are implicit in the understanding of customer needs, establishment of system requirements and the flow down of these requirements to lower levels of the system hierarchy. Suggestions are given to help avoiding these hidden traps, thereby eliminating or alleviating their potentially detrimental effects. The intent of the paper is to make readers aware of these traps when applying QFD for the establishment of requirements, so that they may utilize QFD with a better understanding of its limitations and develop higher quality specifications.
出处 《Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering》 SCIE EI CSCD 2015年第3期316-336,共21页 系统科学与系统工程学报(英文版)
基金 funding from the Humanity and Social Science Youth Foundation of Ministry of Education of China(12YJC630201, 14YJCZH213) the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province(2015JM7378,2015JQ7277) the National Natural Science Foundation of China(71402140)
关键词 QFD requirements establishment VALUE DECISION-MAKING QFD, requirements establishment, value, decision-making
  • 相关文献

参考文献54

  • 1Arrow, K.J. (1951). Social Choice and Individual Values. Wiley, New York.
  • 2Bayus, B.L. (2007). Understanding" customer needs. In: Shane, S. (ed), Blackwell Handbook of Technology and Innovation Management. Blackwell Publishers.
  • 3Bertoni, M., Bertoni, A., Isaksson, O., et al. (2013). Value-oriented concept selection in aero-engine sub-system design: the EVOKE approach. Paper presented at the 23th 1NCOSE International Symposium, Philadelphia, USA, 24-27 June 2013.
  • 4Bouchereau, V & Rowlands, H. (2000). Methods and techniques to help quality function deployment. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 7(1): 8-20.
  • 5Butler, J.C., James, S.D. & Jia, J. (2006). Using attributes to predict objectives in preference models. Decision Analysis, 3(2): 100-116.
  • 6Camevalli, J.A. & Miguel, EC. (2008). Review, analysis and classification of the literature on QFD - Types of research, difficulties and benefits. Intemational Journal of Production Economics, 114(2): 737-754.
  • 7Castagne, S., Curran, R. & Collopy, E (2009). Implementation of value-driven optimisation for the design of aircraft fuselage panels. International Journal of Production Economics, 117(2): 381-388.
  • 8Chan, K.Y., Kwong, C.K. & Wong, T.C. (2011). Modelling customer satisfaction for product development using genetic programming. Journal of Engineering Design, 22(1): 55-68.
  • 9Chan, L.K. & Wu, M.L. (2002). Quality function deployment: a literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 143(3): 463-497.
  • 10Chen, W.C., Hoyle, C. & Henk Jan Wassenaar. (2012). Decision-Based Design: Integrating Consumer Preferences into Engineering Design. Springer.

同被引文献12

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部