期刊文献+

美国大学入学考试SAT的变迁——基于社会历史与意识形态视角的分析 被引量:6

Evolution and Transition of College Entrance Exam SAT in the United States of America——Perspectives from Social History and Ideology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国SAT考试自1926年设立以来,从试题内容和美国公众对SAT作为一项考试制度的关注热点两方面进行分析,可以划分为三个发展阶段。该项考试设计之初曾期待通过弱化高等教育入学考试和中学教学之间的关联,以天资测验的方式进行实现跨越社会阶层的人才选拔。经历近百年的沿革,SAT改革却再次要求更贴近中学教学。如今的SAT依然呈现出与社会阶层、种族之间的强烈相关性。在这番历史的回归中,可以看到美国社会对科学理性主导下标准化测量的追求,以及当代美国社会多元利益主体的不同诉求对考试制度的直接影响。美国特定的社会历史为SAT的诞生与发展提供了直接的土壤,对平等的追求成为贯穿其中的社会意识形态。 As one of the most widely used and deepest researched college entrance ex- ams, SAT has gone through three different development stages since 1926 in which its con- tent and form and its role playing in college application system in the US have also experi- enced many reforms. Among these stages and reforms, two unique factors emerged: the pur- suit for scientific rationality and technological means and different demands requested by multiple stakeholders in contemporary America society. Furthermore, as a social institute, SAT is blossomed by particular social history in the US society. The pursuit for equality, in addition, becomes the dominant ideology throughout the development of SAT. Therefore, dipping into a specific test system offers us a path to understand a specific society and cul- ture. Besides instrumental view, perspectives of social history and ideology should be in- volved in the field of test study.
作者 刘谦 姚曼
出处 《外国教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第9期3-15,共13页 Studies in Foreign Education
关键词 美国 SAT 社会历史与意识形态 多元诉求 平等 America Social History and Ideology SAT Multiple Demands Equality
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Hyunjoon Park.Inequality of Educational Opportunity in Korea by Gender,Socio-Economic Background and Family Structure[J].International Journal of Human Rights,2007,11(1):179-197.
  • 2Wikipedia.SAT[EB/OL].[2014-12-15].http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAT.
  • 3郑若玲,陈为峰.社会维权系统分担高校招生公平责任:美国的启示[J].教育发展研究,2010,30(5):38-41. 被引量:5
  • 4Nicholas Lemann.The Big Test:The Secret History of the American Meritocracy[M].New York:Farrar,Straus and Giroux,2000:17-41.
  • 5Frontline.History of SAT[EB/OL].[2015-01-20].http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/sats/where/timeline.html.
  • 6College Entrance Examination Board.Research Report No.2003-3:A Historical Perspective on the Content of the SAT[EB/OL].[2014-12-15].http://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RR-03-10-Lawrence.pdf.
  • 7王玉衡.美国标准化测验的问题与质疑[J].比较教育研究,2002,23(9):18-22. 被引量:10
  • 8[美]德尔班科.大学:过去,现在与未来[M].范伟,译.北京:中信出版社,2014:7,30.
  • 9刘卫萍,马美茹.美国高等教育大众化发展历程[J].河北师范大学学报(教育科学版),2008,10(9):50-53. 被引量:5
  • 10Bowen,William G.and Derek,Bok.The Shape of the River:Long-Term Consequences of Considering Race in College and University Admissions[M].New Jersey:Princeton University Press,1998:7.

二级参考文献100

  • 1刘宝存.六十年代美国大学教育改革初探[J].外国教育研究,1988(2):16-20. 被引量:4
  • 2杨东平.高等教育入学机会:扩大之中的阶层差距[J].清华大学教育研究,2006,27(1):19-25. 被引量:176
  • 3陈玉琨 钟海清.90年代:美国的基础教育[M].广西师范大学出版社,..
  • 4原春琳.教育部副部长:教育机会不均等就谈不上社会公平[N].中国青年报,2005-06-04.
  • 5吕若,张宗堂.高中教育成为我国高等教育机会不均等的瓶颈[EB/OL](2005-02-13).新华网,http://news.xinhuanet.com/edu/2005-02/16/content_2581581.htm.
  • 6Nisbett R. Intelligence and How to Get It: Why Schools and Culture Count. W. W. Norton[Z]. New York & London. 2009.
  • 7Sternberg R. How can we simuhaneously enhance both academic excellence and diversity?[J]. College and University Journal, 2006, 82 (1):3-9.
  • 8Sternberg R. The rainbow project: Enhancing the SAT through assessment of analytical, practical, and creative skills [J]. Intelligence, 2006, 34: 321-350.
  • 9Lederman D. Debating equity and excellence [Z]. Inside Higher Ed. 2005.
  • 10Bowen W, Tobin E, Kurzweil M. Equity and Excellence in American Higher Education[M]. University of Virginia Press, 2005.

共引文献91

同被引文献44

引证文献6

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部