期刊文献+

要素收益差异、贸易分工与“比较收益悖论” 被引量:2

Factor Income Difference, Trade Division and “Comparative Profit Paradox”
原文传递
导出
摘要 从要素收益的视角出发,同样可以对当前国际贸易分工做出较好的解释,在构建要素收益差异与贸易分工的理论分析框架的基础上,本文提出比较收益原理,即一个国家和地区倾向于更多出口要素相对收益率较高的产品。通过对贸易引力模型的改进,利用主要出口国家贸易数据进行实证检验,检验结果表明了大多数出口国家符合比较收益原理,而中国却存在"比较收益悖论";中国存在"比较收益悖论"的主要原因在于中国大多数部门处于全球价值链下游,更多地以加工贸易的形式参与国际分工。 From the perspective of factor income, we can also make a better explanation on the current international trade division. On the basis of establishing a theoretical analytical framework of factor income differences and trade division, this paper puts forward the comparative profit principle, namely one country or region is inclined to export more products with higher factor relative gains. Through the improvement on the gravity model of trade, it conducts an empirical test on the trade data of the main export countries. The result proves that most of the export countries are in line with the principle of comparative profits, while China has the "comparative profit paradox" . The main reason lies in the factor that most Chinese sectors are located at the downstream of global value chain, participating in the international division of labor more with the form of processing trade.
作者 黎峰
出处 《当代财经》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第9期86-98,共13页 Contemporary Finance and Economics
基金 江苏省社会科学基金青年项目"江苏开放型经济转型发展研究"(11EYC022) 国家社会科学基金一般项目"新丝绸之路经济带建设推动我国开放型经济体系完善 升级研究"(15BJL071) 国家社会科学基金重大项目"贸易大国转型发展的目标升级与战略创新研究"(13&ZD048)
关键词 要素收益差异 比较收益原理 比较收益悖论 贸易引力模型 全球价值链 factor income difference comparative profit principle comparative profit paradox gravity model of trade global value-chain.
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献120

  • 1黄先海,石东楠.对外贸易对我国全要素生产率影响的测度与分析[J].世界经济研究,2005(1):22-26. 被引量:67
  • 2赵志耘,刘晓路,吕冰洋.中国要素产出弹性估计[J].经济理论与经济管理,2006,26(6):5-11. 被引量:107
  • 3江小涓.我国出口商品结构的决定因素和变化趋势[J].经济研究,2007,42(5):4-16. 被引量:194
  • 4王荣昌等主编.《世界近现代史》[M].吉林人民出版社,1981..
  • 5Aitken, Brian, Gordon Hanson and Ann Harrison, 1997, "Spillovers, Foreign Investment, and Export Behaviour", Journal of International Economics 43 (1--2) : 103--132.
  • 6Aw, Bee Yan, Sukkyun Chung and Mark J. Roberts, 2000, "Productivity and Turnover in the Export Market: Micro-level Evidence from the Republic of Korea and Taiwan (China)," World Bank Economic Review 14 (1) : 65--90.
  • 7Baldwin, Richard E., 2005, "Heterogeneous Firms and Trade: Testable and Uutestable Properties of the Melitz Model", NBER Working Paper No. 11471.
  • 8Bernard, Andrew B., Jonathan Eaton, J. Bradford Jensen and Samuel Kortum, 2003, "Plants and Productivity in International Trade," American Economic Review 93: 1268--1290.
  • 9Bernard, A. and J. Bradford Jensen, 1995, "Exporters, Jobs and Wages in U.S. Manufacturing, 1976--1987", Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Mieroeeonomics, 67--119.
  • 10Bernard, Andrew B. and J. Bradford Jensen, 1999a, "Exceptional Exporter Performance: Cause, Effect, or Both?" Journal of lnternational Economics 47 : 1--26.

引证文献2

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部