期刊文献+

形觉剥夺性近视对豚鼠视盘和视网膜形态结构的影响

Effect of form-deprivation myopia on optic nerve head and retinal morphology in guinea pigs
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察形觉剥夺性近视对豚鼠视盘和视网膜形态结构的影响。方法4~5周龄普通级豚鼠20只,采用随机数字表法完全随机分为实验组和对照组,每组各10只。实验组豚鼠右眼建立形觉剥夺性近视模型,时间持续4周。对照组豚鼠正常开放饲养4周,双眼不进行任何干预。形觉剥夺前和形觉剥夺4周后,采用带状光检影验光测量屈光度;A型超声测量仪测量眼轴长度;光相干断层扫描(OCT)仪测量视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)厚度、盘沿面积、视盘面积、平均杯盘比、垂直杯盘比、杯容积以及视网膜厚度、视网膜容积等视盘及视网膜形态结构参数。结果形觉剥夺前,实验组和对照组豚鼠等效球镜度数、眼轴长度、RNFI。厚度、盘沿面积、视盘面积、平均杯盘比、垂直杯盘比、杯容积、视网膜厚度、视网膜容积比较,差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。形觉剥夺4周后,实验组和对照组豚鼠等效球镜度数、眼轴长度比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=-21.426、16.132,P〈0.05)。实验组豚鼠RNFL厚度、视网膜厚度分别为(64.9±17.7)、(142.7±3.4)/zm;对照组豚鼠RNFI.厚度、视网膜厚度分别为(97.9±25.1)、(138.4±3.5)μm。与对照组比较,实验组豚鼠RNFL厚度明显变薄,视网膜厚度明显增厚,差异均有统计学意义(t=-2.845、2.338,P%0.05)。实验组和对照组豚鼠盘沿面积、视盘面积、平均杯盘比、垂直杯盘比、杯容积和视网膜容积比较,差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。实验组豚鼠形觉剥夺前后等效球镜度数、眼轴长度、RNFL厚度、垂直杯盘比、杯容积、视网膜厚度比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=46.001、-50.119、5.385、-3.447、-2.814、-8.911,P%0.05);盘沿面积、视盘面积、平均杯盘比和视网膜容积比较,差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论形觉剥夺性近视可引起豚鼠RNFL厚度变薄,视网膜厚度增厚;对盘沿面积、视盘面积、平均杯盘比、垂直杯盘比、杯容积及视网膜容积无影响。 Objective To evaluate the effect of form deprivation myopia on optic nerve head and retinal morphology in guinea pigs using optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods Twenty guinea pigs aged from 4 to 5 weeks were chosen and randomly divided into the experimental group and control group, with 10 guinea pigs in each group. Form deprivation myopia was established for the right eyes of guinea pigs in experimental group for 4 weeks. The guinea pigs of control group were not intervened. Before and 4 weeks after form deprivation, refraction was measured by retinoscopy after cycloplegia; the axial length was measured by A-scan ultrasound; retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, optic nerve head and retinal morphology of guinea pigs were analyzed using OCT. Results Before form deprivation, there were no statistically significant differences in spherical equivalent, axial length, RNFL thickness, disc edge area, optic disc area, average cup disc ratio, vertical cup disc ratio, cup volume, retinal thickness, or retinal volume between the experimental group and control group of guinea pig (P〈0.05). After 4 weeks of form deprivation, RNFL thickness of (64.9 ± 17.7) μm compared to (97.9±25.1) μm in control group (t= - in guinea pigs in experimental group was thinner 2. 845, P=0.015). Retinal thickness of (142.7±3.4) μm in guinea pigs in experimental group was thicker compared to (138.4+3.5) μm in control group (t= 2. 338, P=0. 038). There were no significant differences in disc edge area, optic disc area, average cupdisc ratio, vertical up disc ratio, cup volume or retinal volume between groups (P〈0.05). There were statistically significant differences in spherical equivalent, axial length, RNFL thickness, vertical cup to disc ratio cup volume, and retinal thickness between after and before form deprivation in the right eye of guinea pigs in the experimental groups (t =46.001, -50. 119, 5.385, 3.447, 2.814, -8.911; P〈0.05), while there were no statistically significant differences ill disc edge area, optic disc area, average cup disc ratio, or retinal volume (P〉0.05). Conclusion Form deprivation myopia has an effect on RNFL and retinal thickness.
出处 《中华眼底病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期477-480,共4页 Chinese Journal of Ocular Fundus Diseases
基金 基金项目:上海市科委自然基金(13ZR1405800) 上海市卫生局青年基金(2013-121) 上海市金山区卫生局青年基金(2013-02)
关键词 近视/并发症 视盘/病理生理学 视网膜/病理生理学 动物实验 Myopia/complications Optic disk/physiopathology Retina/physiopathology Animal experimentation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献54

  • 1Ji Young Lee,You Kyung Lee,Jung Il Moon,Myoung Hee Park.Spectral domain optical coherence tomography crosssectional image of optic nerve head during intraocular pressure elevation[J].International Journal of Ophthalmology(English edition),2014,7(6):1022-1029. 被引量:1
  • 2LEQi-hua,CHENGNeng-neng,WUWei,CHURen-yuan.Effects of pirenzepine ophthalmic solution on form-deprivation myopia in the guinea pigs[J].Chinese Medical Journal,2005(7):561-566. 被引量:11
  • 3[1]Quigly HA, Anderson DR. The dynamics and location of axonal transport blockade by acute intraocular pressure elevation in primate optic nerve[J].Invest Ophthalmol. 1976,15:606~616.
  • 4[2]Minckler DS, Bunt AH, Klock IB. Radiographic and cytochemical ultrastructural studies of axoplasmic transport in the monkey optic nerve head[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 1978,17:33~50.
  • 5[3]Ou b, Terada N, Ohno S, et al. Ultreatructural study of axonal cytoskeletons in the optic neve damaged by acutely elevated intraocular pressure using quick - freezing and deep - etching technique[J]. Ophthalmic Res. 1997,29:48~54.
  • 6[4]Johansson JO.The lamina cribrosa in the eyes of rats, hamsters, gerbils and guinea pigs[J] .Acta Anat. 1987,128:55~62.
  • 7[5]Quigley HA,Flower RW,Addicks EM,et al. The mechanism of optic nerve damage in experimental acute intraocular pressure elevation[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1980,19:505~517.
  • 8[6]Dahlin LB, Rydevik B, Mclear WG, et al. Changes in fast axonal transport during experimental nerve compression at low pressures[J]. Exp Neurol.1984,84:29~36.
  • 9Huang D,Swanson EA,Lin CP,et al.Optical coherence tomography.Science 1991;254(11):1178-1181.
  • 10Hee MR,Izatt JA,Swanson EA,et al.Optical coherence tomography of the human retina.Arch Ophthalmol 1995; 113(3):325-332.

共引文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部