期刊文献+

英国数据挖掘著作权例外条款研究及其启示 被引量:11

Research on UK Copyright Exceptions to Data Mining and Its Enlightenment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 数据挖掘是大数据时代重要的科学研究方法。国际图书馆界十分关注数据挖掘相关法律问题的研究,呼吁通过立法而不是以许可方式保障用户的数据挖掘权。英国新修订的著作权法为数据挖掘提供了著作权例外,明确规定例外适用的主体、目的、形式要件及限制,涵盖数据挖掘的完整过程,符合"三步测试法"的要求。我国图书馆界应当加强数据挖掘著作权例外的研究,关注并积极应对出版商关于数据挖掘的政策动向,并推动国际和国内的相关立法。 Data mining is an important method of scientific research in the big data era. International library community concerned about the legal issues related to data mining, and called for legislation rather than license to guarantee the users' rights of data mining. Newly-revised copyright law of UK provides copyright exceptions to data mining, stipulating the subject, purpose, formal elements and restrictions, when the exception applies, which covers the complete process of data mining, and in line with the requirements of "three- step test". Chinese library community should strengthen relative research, respond to the publishers' policy trends about data mining actively, and promote the improvement of domestic and international legislation.
作者 徐轩 孙益武
出处 《图书馆建设》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第9期10-14,共5页 Library Development
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"基于<马拉喀什条约>视角的图书馆无障碍服务版权制度研究" 项目编号:14YJC870023 上海图书馆学会一般课题"研究型图书馆电子图书阅读推广载体研究" 项目编号:14STX008C的研究成果之一
关键词 数据挖掘 文本与数据挖掘 著作权例外 图书馆 Data mining Text and data mining Copyright exception Library
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1IFLA. IFLA Statement on Text and Data Mining [EB/OL].[2015- 03-06]. http:l/www.ifla.orglfiles/assetslclm/statements/ iflastatement on text and_data_mining.pdf.
  • 2UK Government, Text Mining and Data Analytics in Call for Evidence Responses [EB/OL]. [2015-03-06]. http://webarchive. nationalarchives.gov.uk1201406030935491http:llwww.ipo.gov. uk/ipreview-doc-t .pdf.
  • 3HanJiawei,KamberM.数据挖掘:概念与技术[M].范明,孟小峰,译.北京:机械工业出版社,2012.
  • 4Joint Infomlation Systems Committee. The Value and Benefits of Text Mining [EB/OL]. [2015--03-06]. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/sites/ default/files/value-text-mining.pdf.
  • 5WIPO. Provisional Working Document Towards an Appropriate International Legal Instrument (in Whatever Form) on Limitations and Exceptions for Educational~ Teaching and Research Institutions and Persons with other Disabilities Containing Comments and Textual Suggestions [EBlOL ].[ 2015-O3-O7].http:l/www. wipo.intledocsl mdocs/copyrightlen/sccr_271sccr_27 _ref_sccr_26_4 prov.pdf.
  • 6IFLA,ICA,EIEL&INNOVARTE. Treaty Proposal on Copyright Limitations and Exceptions for Libraries and Archives (Version 4.4)[EB/OL].[2015-03-07]. http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/hq/ topics/exceptions-limitations/tlib_v4_4.pdf.
  • 7Hargreaves I. Digital Opportunity: A Review of Intellectual Property and Growth [EBIOL].[2615-O3-O7].https:llwww.gov. uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/ 32563/ipreview-finalreport.pdf.
  • 8British Council. The Copyright and Rights in Performances (Research, Education, Libraries and Archives) Regulations 2014 [EB/OL]. [2015-03-08]. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/ 2014/1372/regulation/3/made#regulation-3-1 -a.
  • 9UK Intellectual Property Office. Exceptions to Copyright: Research [EB/OL]. [2015-03-08]. https://www.gov.uk/ government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/ 375954/Research.pdf.
  • 10WIPO. Agreed Statements Concerning the WIPO Copyright Treaty [EB/OL]. [2015-03-08]. http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ text.jsp?file id=295456.

二级参考文献24

  • 1COLE F J, Hulme E W. The history of comparative anatomy-A statistical analysis of the literature [ J]. Science Progress, 1917 ( 11 ) : 578 - 596.
  • 2Lotka A J. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity[J]. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 1926,16(12) :317 - 323.
  • 3Gross P L K, Gross E M. College libraries and chemical education [ J]. Science, 1927, 66 (1713) :385 -389.
  • 4Bradford S C. Sources of information on specific subjects[J].Engineering, 1934, 137 : 85 - 86.
  • 5Garfield E. Citation Indexes for Science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas [ J ]. Science, 1955, 122 ( 3159 ) : 108 -111.
  • 6Hirsch J E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output[ J]. The National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 2005, 102 ( 46 ) : 16569 - 16572.
  • 7Seglen O. Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research [ J ]. BMJ, 1997,314 (7079) :497 - 502.
  • 8Small H. Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents[ J]. Journal of the American Society for In- formation Science and Technology, 1973,24 (4) : 265 - 269.
  • 9Chen C. Generalised similarity analysis and pathfinder network scaling[ J ]. Journal of the American Society for Information and Technology, 1998,10 (2) :107 -128.
  • 10Claude Masouy e,Guide To The BERNE CONVENTION For The Protection Of Literary And Artistic Works(Paris Act 1971)(1978),9.6.

共引文献519

同被引文献127

引证文献11

二级引证文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部