期刊文献+

资源税改革与我国区域“资源诅咒”困境 被引量:5

Resource tax reform and regional "resource curse" in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 资源禀赋在支持经济增长的同时,会产生"资源诅咒"现象,即资源优势阻碍经济增长.目前研究较少考虑资源税制设计对区域"资源诅咒"的影响,缺乏资源税改革对区域演化作用深入研究.基于历年统计数据,本文研究当前我国区域"资源诅咒"分布情况,并构建动态多区域CGE模型,编制社会核算矩阵(SAM),分别以2%、5%和10%的煤炭资源税率设置模拟场景,分析资源税改革对区域社会经济、产业发展和"资源诅咒"演化的影响,并提出破解我国区域"资源诅咒"对策.研究结果表明:资源税改革可在一定程度上抑制我国区域"资源诅咒"恶化,但会使产品价格发生波动,影响宏观经济发展;同时改革会影响第二产业发展速度,尤其是抑制资源生产和加工产业增长,促进资源在各产业间合理流动,使资源消费和产业结构趋于理性,从而适度控制各区域的能源供给和需求,逐步转变各区域增长方式,协调各区域社会经济发展. Natural resource endowment is considered to be one of the most important sources in economic growth, but while resources promote economic growth, it will cause "resource curse", where the abundance of resources has hindered economic growth. Many researchers have studied "resource curse" mechanism from the terms of trade deterioration, the "Dutch disease" or human capital investment but lack of consideration of resource tax. As we know, the resources tax is an important factor in resource development and management, but the study on interaction between the tax system and "resource curse" is less and difficult to reflect the impact on "resource curse" by tax reform. The paper first analyzes the regional distribution of China's "resource curse", and tries to explore the role of resource tax reform on "resource curse" in theory. On this basis, the paper builds a dynamic multi-regional CGE model, and takes coal resources as an example to further estimate the impact on China's social economy, industry and regional development via tax reform with 2%, 50% and 10% tax rate. The results show: resource tax reform can inhibit regional "resource curse", but will fluctuate the price and economy; meanwhile resource tax reform can affect the secondary industry (especiMly resource production industry), and make economic structure reasonable, which can control the demand of energy in different regions improve the development style and coordinate the development of all regions. At last, the paper gives suggestions to make reference and decision-making basis for the lifting of the "resource curse".
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第9期2232-2241,共10页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金(71203002) 中国博士后基金(2013M540398 2015T80472) 南京理工大学"紫金之星"计划 江苏省服务型政府研究基地支持
关键词 区域“资源诅咒” 资源税改革 动态多区域CGE模型 煤炭 regional "resource curse" resource tax reform dynamic multi-regional CGE coal
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Auty R M. Resource-based industriMization: Sowing the oil in eight oil-exporting countries[M]. Oxford: Claren- don, 1990.
  • 2Sachs J D, Warner A M. The big push, natural resource booms and growth[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 1999, 59(1): 43-76.
  • 3Diilger F, Lopcu K, Burga A L, et al. Is Russia suffering from Dutch Disease? Cointegration with structural break[J]. Resources Policy, 2013, 38(4): 605-612.
  • 4Bjorvatn K, Farzanegan M R. Demographic transition in resource rich countries: A blessing or a curse?[J]. World Development, 2013, 45: 337-351.
  • 5Eisgruber L. The resource curse: Analysis of the applicability to the large-scale export of electricity from renew- able resources[J]. Energy Policy, 2013, 57: 429-440.
  • 6Boschini A, Pettersson J, Roine J. The resource curse and its potential reversal[J]. World Development, 2013, 43: 19-41.
  • 7Corrigan C C. Breaking the resource curse: Transparency in the natural resource sector and the extractive industries transparency initiative[J]. Resources Policy, 2014, 40: 17-30.
  • 8Costa H K D M, Santos E M D. Institutional analysis and the "resource curse" in developing countries[J]. Energy Policy, 2013, 63: 788-795.
  • 9Robinson J A, Torvik R, Verdier T. Political foundations of the resource curse: A simplification and a comment[J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2014, 106: 194-198.
  • 10徐康宁,王剑.自然资源丰裕程度与经济发展水平关系的研究[J].经济研究,2006,41(1):78-89. 被引量:755

共引文献1025

同被引文献98

引证文献5

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部