荀子未作《非十二子》篇贬抑思孟段新证

New Evidence of Criticisms on Zisi-Mencius in Chapter of Critical Reviews on Twelve Scholars Not Written by Xunzi

迄今为止,大多数学者仍持《非十二子》篇中贬抑思孟的部分为荀子亲作的观点,只有周炽成等少数学者证得并主张其为伪作。然而,周先生的考证尚有不足甚至疏漏之处,本文主要对这几点不足进一步考证,力求以更完善合理的推论进一步对该部分证伪。本文首先对该部分的写作意图进行考察,由该部分与其他部分之间的行文矛盾证明其伪;并重新考证该部分的作者,主张该部分为子游氏后学所作,而由荀子后学引入荀文。希望以此番考证使人们更准确地理解荀子的思想,进而倡导以学理争鸣并拒绝门户之见的为学态度。

So far, most scholars still hold Non -12child debasing Si Meng section as Xunzi making by himself, only a few of the Zhou Chi Cheng scholars prove and elaim that it is counterfeit. However, Mr Zhou＇s research, there are still some deficiencies and omissions, this paper mainly on this issue further research, and strive to be more perfect and reasonable inferences further on the part of the falsification. Firstly, this paper carried on the inspection of the writing intention by the contradiction between the part and the other part to prove the false and re verify the author of this part, advocated the sub tour＇s followers made, and by Xunzi introduced Xun Wen. Hope that some textual research make people more accurately comprehend Xunzi thought to advocate learning attitude of academic contend and refusing to parochial prejudice