期刊文献+

成人腭部微种植体植入区域骨皮质密度的锥形束CT测量分析 被引量:3

Evaluation on palatal cortical bone density for mini-implant placement in adults by cone beam computed tomography
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:利用锥形束CT(cone beam computed tomography,CBCT)测量腭部骨皮质密度,分析腭部骨皮质密度的分布规律。方法:选取107例20~40岁成人(男51例、女56例)的CBCT影像数据,测量腭部28个点位的骨皮质密度,以亨斯菲尔德单位(Hounsfield units,HU)表示,重复测量方差分析比较不同部位间骨密度差异,t检验比较骨密度的性别差异。结果:腭部各测量点位中骨皮质密度最大值为(976.24±138.66)HU,最小值为(460.45±183.33)HU。除Y0X0、Y8X0、Y8X6、Y12X6、Y20X6、Y20X9、Y24X6和Y24X9外,其余20个测量点位的骨皮质密度值性别差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。腭部骨皮质密度有由前向后递减的趋势(P=0.000)。腭前部中缝旁3 mm区域的骨皮质密度高于腭前部中缝区(P〈0.05)。结论:经CBCT获取了成人腭部骨皮质密度的分布规律,为腭部微种植体植入部位的选择提供了参考。 Objective:To evaluate the cortical bone densities of the palatal area using cone beam computed tomography(CBCT).Methods:CBCT scans of 107 adults(51 men,56 women,20 to 40 years old)were selected and reconstructed. Palatal cortical bone density was measured in Hounsfield units(HU)at 28 sites. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to test the intragroup differences of cortical bone density,and the relationship between gender were analyzed by t-test. Results:The maximum value of palatal cortical bone densities was(976.24±138.66)HU,and the minimum value was(460.45±183.33)HU. There were significant differences between the male and female groups in all sites(P〈0.05),except Y0X0,Y8X0,Y8X6,Y12X6,Y20X6,Y20X9,Y24X6 and Y24X9. Palatal cortical bone densities showed a tendency to decrease posteriorly(P=0.000). The cortical bone densities at locations that 3 mm from the midpalatal suture to lateral side were greater than at midpalatal suture in the anterior palate(P〈0.05). Conclusion:The distribution of palatal cortical bone densities in adults are obtained by CBCT. These data might provide valuable information for selecting sites to place mini-implants in the palate.
出处 《重庆医科大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第8期1143-1147,共5页 Journal of Chongqing Medical University
基金 重庆市科学技术委员会资助项目(编号:cstc2013jcyj A10010)
关键词 骨密度 微种植体 锥形束CT palate bone density mini-implant cone beam computed tomography
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Okazaki J,Komasa Y,Sakai D,et al.A torque removal study on the primary stability of orthodontic titanium screw mini-implants in the cortical bone of dog femurs[J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2008,37(7): 647-650.
  • 2Holm L,Cunningham SJ,Petrie A,et al.An in vitro study of factors affecting the primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants[J].Angle Or- thod,2012,82(6) : 1022-1028.
  • 3Misch CE.Density of bone:effect on treatment plans,surgical ap- proach,healing, and progressive boen loading[J].Int J Oral Implantol, 1989,6(2) :23-31.
  • 4严拥庆,高益鸣.正畸用微螺钉支抗种植体的稳定性评价[J].上海口腔医学,2011,20(5):540-544. 被引量:7
  • 5Wilmes B, Dreseher D.Impact of bone quality, implant type, and implantation site preparation on insertion torques of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage[J].Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2011,40(7) :697- 703.
  • 6Shah AH,Behrents RG,Kim KB,et al.Effects of screw and host factors on insertion torque and pullout strength[J].Angle Orthod, 2011, 82(4) :603-610.
  • 7Cha JY,Kil JK,Yoon TM,et al.Miniserew stability evaluated with computerized tomography scanning[J].American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2010,137 ( 1 ) : 73-79.
  • 8Reeves TE, Mah P, McDavid WD.Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam CT:a clinical applieation[J].Dentomaxillofae Radiol,2012,41 (6) :500-508.
  • 9Parsa A, Ibrahim N, Hassan B, et al.Bone quality evaluation at den- tal implant site using multisliee CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT[J]. Clinical Oral Implants, 2015,26( 1 ) : el-7.
  • 10Marquezan M, Lau CT,Mattos, et al.Bone mineral density[J].Angle Orthod, 2012,82( 1 ) : 62-66.

二级参考文献46

  • 1张光,韩邕,孙晶,刘景鑫,韩学峰.骨质疏松定量CT诊断标准的研究[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,1998,4(3):20-23. 被引量:11
  • 2EgoSeeman,段云波.骨质疏松──一种起源于人生最初二十年的疾病[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,1995,1(2):128-132. 被引量:5
  • 3Gracco A, Luca L, Cozzani M, et al. Assessment of palatal bone thickness in adults with cone beam computerized tomography. Aust Orthod J, 2007,23(2) :09-113.
  • 4King KS, Lam EW, Faulkner MG, et al. Predictive factors of vertical bone depth in the paramedian palate of adolescents. Angle Orthod, 2006,76(5) :745-751.
  • 5Kido H, Schulz EE, Kumar A, et al. Implant diameter and bone density: effect on initial stability and pull-out resistance. J Oral Implantol, 1997,23(4) :163- 169.
  • 6Ikumi N, Tsutsumi S. Assessment of correlation between computerized tomography values of the bone and cutting torque values at implant placement: a clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2005,20(2) :253-260.
  • 7Norton MR, Gamble C. Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2001,12 ( 1 ) :79-84.
  • 8Moon SH, Park SH, Lira WH, et al. Palatal bone density in adult subjects: implications for mini-implant placement. Angle Orthod. 2010,80( 1 ) :137-44.
  • 9Turkyilmaz l, Turner C, Ozbek EN, et al. Relations between the bone density values from computerized tomography, and stability parameters: a clinical study of 230 regular platform implants. J Clin Periodontol, 2007,34 ( 8 ) :716-722.
  • 10Roberts WE, Helm FR, Marshall KJ, et al. Rigid endosseous implants for orthodontic and orthopedic anchorage [J]. Angle Orthod, 1989, 59(4): 247-256.

共引文献22

同被引文献23

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部