3Buckley CH. Normal endometrium and non - proliferative conditions of the endometrium [M]. Obstetrical and gynaecolngical pathology. 5th ed. London : Churchill Livingstone, 2002, 391 - 442.
4Olawale BB, Ademola AO, Gbadebo AG. Tubal abnormalities in patients with intrauterine adhesion : evaluation usinghysterosalpingography [J]. Annals of African Medicine, 2014, 13 (4) : 179 - 183.
5Salle B, Gaucherand P, de Saint Hilaire P, et al. Transvaginal sonohysterographic evaluation of intrauterine adhesions [ J ]. J Clin Ultrasound, 1999, 27 (3): 131-134.
6Sylvestre C, Child TJ, Tulandi T, et al. A prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of two - and three - dimensional sonohysterography in women with intrauterine lesions [ J ]. Fertility and Sterility, 2003, 79 (5): 1222-1225.
7Hsieh YY, Tsai HD, Chang CC, et al. Low - Dose Aspirin for Infertile Women with Thin Endometrium Receiving Intrauterine Insemination: A Prospective, Randomized Study [ J ]. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2000, 17 (3): 174-177.
8Wang L, Qiao J, Li R, et al. Role of endometrial blood flow assessment with color Doppler energy in predicting pregnancy outcome of IVF- ET cycles [ J]. Reprod Bial Endocrinol, 2010, 18 (8): 122.
9Cheek JH, Choe JK, Amui J, et al. Evaluation of the importance of late follicular phase endometrial echo patterns and pregnancy outcome following embryo transfer by evaluating infertile donor/ recipient pairs [J]. Clin Exp Obst Gyneeol, 2011, 38 (4) : 318 -319.
10March C, Israel R, March A. Hysteroscopic managment of intrauterine adhesions [ J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1978, 130: 653 - 657.
