期刊文献+

论法学教授的法律知识性权力 被引量:2

On Law Professor's Right to Legal Knowledge
原文传递
导出
摘要 法学教授是高深法律学问的看守人,而在强调精英化、职业化治理的现代社会中,这种高深的学问成为其知识性权力的基础。在现代社会,法学教授不仅是在讲台上的教师或者是书斋内坐而论道的学者,由于其传授或者研究的是一种国家治理的学问,其与政治、司法及立法等诸多领域都有着密切的勾连。基于一切权力都有滥用的特质,因此,对于我国法学教授这种知识共同体而言,其亦有滥行权力的风险,应当采取职业管制的方式,使得这种法律知识性权力不致于越轨。同时,不仅我国存在着"法律知识异化"或者法律知识性权力越轨的现象,也存在着法学教授怠于行使或者不敢行使其知识权力而导致的"法律知识虚化"现象,因此,法学教授应当基于一种神圣的使命感,从社会责任承担的角度来实现其职业的调适。 Legal prolessor is the prolound knowledge keeper of law, which is the basic knowledge of source of power in the modern society emphasizing the elite, the governance of the occupation. Legal professors are not only the teachers on the platform or research scholars, but have a close hook with political, judicial and legislative and other fields because its teaching or research is a kind of skills of state governance. Because all power has the possibility of abuse, the community of knowledge such as legal professor, also has the possibility of abuse, therefore, we should take the way of occupation control to make the legal knowledge power not deviate. At the same time, there is not only the phenomenon of alienation of legal knowledge or deviation of legal knowledge power in our country, but also the failure not to exercise intellectual power or the phenomenon of legal knowledge false by the legal professor. Therefore, legal professor shall be a holy mission based on adaptive bear, in the perspeetive of social responsibility to achieve their occupation.
作者 宋远升
机构地区 华东政法大学
出处 《法学评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第5期31-41,共11页 Law Review
关键词 法学教授 法律知识性权力 自我管制 Legal Professor Power of-Legal Knowledge Selfeontrol
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献138

共引文献452

同被引文献41

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部