期刊文献+

The movement of "false antennae" in butterflies with "false head" wing patterns

蝴蝶中“假触角”的“假头”翅模式
原文传递
导出
摘要 In many butterfly species of the family Lycaenidae, the morphology and color pattern of the hind wings, together with certain behaviors, suggests the presence of a false head (FH) at the posterior end of the perching individual. This FH is consi- dered an adaptation to escape from visually oriented predators. A frequent component of the FH are the tails that presumably resemble the antennae, and the typical hind wings back-and-forth movement along the sagittal plane (HWM) performed while perching apparently move the tails in a way that mimics antennal movement. By exposing 33 individuals from 18 species of Lycaenidae to a stuffed insectivorous bird, we tested two alternative hypotheses regarding HWM. The first hypothesis proposes that, when the butterfly is observed at close range, the HWM distorts the shape of the false head thus reducing its deceiving effect and, therefore, selection will favor butterflies that stop moving their wings when a predator is close by; the second hypothesis says that an increase in the frequency of HWM improves its deflective effect when the butterfly confronts a predator at close range. Our results tend to support the second hypothesis because half of the butterflies started to move their hind wings or increased the rate of HWM when exposed to the stuffed bird; however a substantial proportion of butterflies (30%) stopped moving their hind wings or decreased the rate of HWM as expected from the first hypothesis. Our observations also showed that there is great variation in the rates of HWM, and demonstrated the existence of alternative ways of producing "vivid" movement of the hind wing tails (the "false antennae") in the absence of HWM [Current Zoology 61 (4): 758-764, 2015].
出处 《Current Zoology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2015年第4期758-764,共7页 动物学报(英文版)
关键词 Butterflies LYCAENIDAE Predator deception Anti-predator behavior Wing morphology 蝴蝶效应 触角 捕食者 近距离 灰蝶科 后翅 移动 运动
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Cooper WE, 1998. Conditions favoring anticipatory and reactive displays deflecting predatory attack. Behav. Ecol. 9: 598-504.
  • 2Cordero C, 2001. A different look at the 'false head' of butterflies. Ecol. Ent. 26: 106-108.
  • 3Eisner T, 2003. For Love of Insects. Cambridge and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • 4Krizek G, 1998. Tri-dimensionality of the "false-heads" of lycae- nid hindwings (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Holartic Lepid. 5: 47-48.
  • 5Owen DF, 1971. Tropical Butterflies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • 6Riley AM, Loxdale HD, 1988. Possible adaptive significance of "tail" structure in "false head" Lycaenid Butterflies. Ent. Rec. J. Var. 100: 59-61.
  • 7Robbins R, 1980. The Lycaenid "false head" hypothesis: Histori- cal review and quantitative analysis. J. Lepid. Soc. 34: 194- 208.
  • 8Robbins R, 1981. The "False head" hypothesis: Predation and wing pattern variation in Lycaenid butterflies. Amer. Nat. 118: 770-775.
  • 9Robbins R, 1985. Independent evolution of "false head" behavior in Riodinidae. J. Lepid. Soc. 39: 224-225.
  • 10Ruxton GD, Sherratt TN, Speed MP, 2004. Avoiding Attack: The Evolutionary Ecology of Crypsis, Warning Signals, and Mimi- cry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部