期刊文献+

释古与疑古——19世纪西方汉学界的“古史辨” 被引量:6

The Reinterpretation of Chinese History——the “Gu Shi Bian”( 古史辨) in the Community of 19th Century's Sinologists
原文传递
导出
摘要 20世纪20年代,"古史辨"派在中国的学术舞台上脱颖而出。然而,就在古史辨派兴起之前的半个世纪,中国古史同样也是西方汉学界热议的话题。湛约翰、艾约瑟、金斯密、翟理思、花之安、啊查理等当时汉学界的活跃人物纷纷参与其中高谈阔论。通过对中西方在语言、宗教、文字等各方面的比较,汉学家们就中国文明的起源、上古历史和古书的真伪等问题展开了激烈的争辩。研究这段几乎被遗忘的历史,不仅有助于加深我们对近代西方汉学发展历程的认识,同时也为研究近代西方世界中国形象的建构过程提供了一个重要的参考。 In 1920 s,the 'Gu Shi Bian'school became a new star in the circle of Chinese history study. But the history of ancient China had already hotly debated by the Western Sinologists nearly half a century before.Through the comparison of languages,religions and cultures between China and the West,such questions as the origin of the Chinese civilization,the truthfulness of ancient history and the reliability of Chinese classics were intensely debated in the community of Sinologists.
作者 陈喆
机构地区 中山大学历史系
出处 《史林》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第4期96-106,220-221,共11页 Historical Review
基金 教育部人文社科青年课题"信古与疑古--19世纪西方人的中国上古史论争"(批准号:10YJC770010)阶段性成果 "中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金"(批准号:12wkpy55)资助课题
  • 相关文献

参考文献70

  • 1顾颉刚.《古史辨自序》(上),河北教育出版社2001年版,第4,14-16页.
  • 2Alun David, "Sir William Jones, Biblical Orientalism and Indian Scholarship," Modern Asian Studies, VoL 30, no. 1, 1996, p. 174.
  • 3Thomas R. Trautmann, Aryans and British India, Berkeley : University of California Press, 1997, p. 28.
  • 4Thomy Ballantyne, Orientalism and Race: Aryanism in British Empire, New York : Palgrave, 2002, p. 58.
  • 5P. J. Marshall, ed. , The British Discovery of Hinduism in the Eighteenth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1970, pp. 24-35.
  • 6Friedrich Max MUller, Chips from German Workshop Vol. I, London: Longmans, 1867, p. xix; Ffiedrich Max Mtiller, Introduction to the Science of Religion, London: Longman, 1867, p. 9.
  • 7Leon Poliakov, The Aryan Myth, translated by Edmund Howard, London:Chatto & Windus Heinemann for Sussex University Press, 1974, pp. 256-257.
  • 8Maurice Olender, The Languages of Paradise: Race, Religion and Philology in the Nineteenth Century,translated by Arthur Goldhammer, Massachusetts: Havard University Press, 1992, pp. 58-59.
  • 9Friedrich Max Mttller, The Science of Language (third edition), London: Longman, 1862, p. 27, 229.
  • 10Robert Gordon Latham, Elements of Comparative Philology, London: Walton and Maberty, 1862, p. 748.

二级参考文献132

  • 1桑兵.癸卯元旦留日学生排满演说史实考辨[J].学术研究,1984(3):73-77. 被引量:4
  • 2章开沅.辛亥革命时期的社会动员——以“排满”宣传为实例[J].社会科学研究,1996(5):93-99. 被引量:25
  • 3孙隆基.清季民族主义与黄帝崇拜之发明[J].历史研究,2000(3):68-79. 被引量:65
  • 4Norman J.Girardot.The Victorian Translation of China-James Legge 's Oriental Pilgrimage[M].Berkeley:University of California Press,2002.
  • 5Thomas R.Trautmann.Aryan and British India[M].Berkeley:University of California Press,1997.
  • 6S.N.Mukherjee.Sir William Jones:a Study in Eighteenth-Century British Attitudes to India[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1968.
  • 7Romila Thapar.The Theory of Aryan Race and India:History and Politics[J].Social Scientist,Vol.24,No 1/3,1996.
  • 8Tony Ballantyne.Orientalism and Race-Aryanism in the British Empire[M].Hampshire:Palgrave,2002.
  • 9Gregory Blue.Gobineau on China:Race Theory,the Yellow Peril,and the Critique of Modernity[J].Journal of World History,Vol.10,No.1,1999.
  • 10Leon Poliakov.The Aryan Myth[M].Translated by Edmund Howard.Chatto:Sussex University Press,1974.

共引文献23

同被引文献22

引证文献6

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部