期刊文献+

碳限额与交易机制下供应链运作优化研究 被引量:24

Study on Supply Chain Operations Optimizationunder Carbon Cap and Trade Mechanism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 碳限额与交易机制是一种利用市场手段来控制碳排放总量的有力措施,受到了世界各国的高度关注。本文针对碳限额与交易机制下供应链运作优化问题,考虑由供应商和采购商构成的两级供应链系统,建立了碳限额与交易机制下的供应链联合经济批量(JELS)模型,求解出了最优生产批量和最优订购批量。通过与传统的联合经济批量模型比较,论证了碳限额与交易机制的有效性,解析和数值算例分析了碳限额与交易机制下碳价和碳限额等因素对供应链决策、碳排放总量和总成本的影响,从解析结论和数值算例分析中得到了一些碳限额与交易机制下供应链运作管理的新见解。 Global warming caused by carbon emissionsposes a serious threat to globalecosystems and human survival. How to reduce carbon emissions effectively has become a worldwide concern. Carbon cap and trade mechanism are effective measures to regulate carbon emissions by market means. These measures areregarded as one of the most effective market mechanisms. EU emissions trading system (EU ETS) is one of the most influential carbon emission trading market in the world. In order to cope with regulation policyon carbon emissions, firms need to take carbon emissions intoconsideration in their operations. Some scholars have studied the production operation of a single firm at micro level, includingoperations optimization models with carbon emission constraints and the analysis of the influence of carbon emissions factors on firm's operationsoptimization. However, firms are not isolated. If only considering carbon emissions from the perspective of a single firm, we would overlook the impact ofthe interactions among multiple firms onthe supply chain system. In addition, the carbon footprint of other supply chain members increaseswith thearnounts of their transportations and inventories.Therefore, it is necessary to study the optimization of supply chain operations under carbon cap and trade mechanism from the perspective of supply chain management. Moreover, the study tries tooptimize operational costs and carbon footprint as a whole. This paper focuses onthe optimization of supply chain operations under carbon cap and trade mechanism. Based onthe two-level supply chain that consists of a single vendor and a single buyer, this paper proposes a modified joint economic lot sizing (JELS) model under carbon cap and trademechanism, and analyze how to optimize operational costs and carbon emissions. Secondly, this study compared with the classic JELS model, and discussed the impact of carbon cap and trade, carbon price and carbon cap on supply chain decisionsforcarbon emissions and operational costs. Some managerial insights of supply chain operations under carbon cap and trade mechanism are provided based onthe analysisresults. The study shows that the optimal value of production quantity or order quantity of the modified JELS model is between that of classical JELS model and that of the model which only considers minimizing carbon emissions. The carbon cap and trade mechanism can induce the supply chain to reduce carbon emissions, which implies the effectiveness of carbon cap and trade mechanism. Especially, carbon emission reduction does not necessarily lead tuthe increase of operational costs in the supply chain. The conditions under which supply chain may reduce carbon emissions andoperational costs simultaneouslyare analyzed, There exists a threshold of carbon cap which determines whether to trade carbon emission permits or not in the supply chain. The operational costs of a supply chain are bound to increase when a supply chain buys carbon emission permits from market. If carbon price is assumed fixed, the carbon cap of a single supply chain has no effect on order quantity, production quantity and operational costs of the supply chain system, This conclusion does not mean the invalidation of carbon cap and trade mechanism. On the contrary, it emphasizes the necessity of reasonable carbon pricing when adopting carbon cap policy.Furthermore, if the carbon cap decreases (or increases), the supply chain has to trade more (or less) carbon emission permits, and leads to increase (or decrease) operational costs. The above results are useful for a supply chain to make right decisions under carbon cap and trade mechanism. Finally, the derived propositions and managerial insights are illustrated by numerical examples.
出处 《管理工程学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期199-206,共8页 Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70971048)
关键词 碳排放 碳限额与交易 联合经济批量(JELS) 供应链运作优化 carbon emission carbon cap and trade JELS supply chain operations optimization
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1ZhangYuejun, Weiiming. An overview of current research on EU ETS: Evidence from its operatingmeehanism and economic effect[J]. Applied Energy,2010, 87(6): 1804-1814.
  • 2Letmathe P, BalakrishnanN. Environmental considerations on the optimalproduct mix[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2005, 167(2): 398-412.
  • 3Rosic H, BauerG, JammerneggW. A framework for economic andenvironmental sustainability and resilience of supply chains[J], Rapid Modelling for Increasing Competitiveness Tools and Mindset, Springer,2009, pp. 91-104.
  • 4ChenX, BenjaafarS, ElomriA. The carbon-constrained EOQ[R]. Working Paper, University of Minnesota, 2011.available at: <http://www.isye.urnn.edu/faculty/pdf/cbe-2011 .pdf>.
  • 5Bonney M, JaberMY. Environmentally responsible inventory models: non-classical models for a non-classical era. International Journal of ProductionEconomics, 2011, 133 (1): 43-53.
  • 6ArslanMC, Turkay M. EOQ revisited with sustainability considerations[R],working paper, 2010. available at: < home.ku.edu.tr/mturkay/pub/EOQ Sustainability.pdf>.
  • 7HuaGuowei,ChengTCE,WangShouyang. Managingcarbon footprints in inventory management[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2011, 132 (2): 178-185.
  • 8何大义,马洪云.碳排放约束下企业生产与存储策略研究[J].资源与产业,2011,13(2):63-68. 被引量:35
  • 9ZhuQ, SarkisJ. Relationships between operational practices and performance among early adopters of green supply chain management practices in Chinese [J].Joumal of Operations Management, 2004, 22(3): 265-289.
  • 10Benjaafar S, LiY and DaskinM. Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: Insights from simple models[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2013,10(1): 99-116.

二级参考文献25

  • 1刘伟平,戴永务.碳排放权交易在中国的研究进展[J].林业经济问题,2004,24(4):193-197. 被引量:60
  • 2Oberthur S. , Ott, H. E.. The Kyoto Protocol:International Climate Policy for the 21st Century [M]. Berlin/ Heidelberg/New York, Springer, 1999.
  • 3香港环境保护署.2008空气污染管理(修订)条例草案[Z].香港,2008,http://www.legco.gov.hk/yr07-08/chinese/bills/brief/b26_brf.pdf.
  • 4魏一鸣,等.中国能源报告(2008):碳排放研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2008:134.
  • 5Monica, B. , Frabcesco, G.. Electricity pricing under "carbon emissions trading": A dominant firm with competitive fringe model [J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(8) : 4200-4220.
  • 6Kara, M. , et al. The impacts of EU CO2 emissions trading on electricity markets and electricity consumers in Finland [J]. Energy Economics, 2008, 30(2) : 193-211.
  • 7Tsikalakis, A.G., Hatziargyriou, N.D.. Environmental benefits of distributed generation with and without emissions trading [J]. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(6): 3395-3409.
  • 8Damien, D. , Philippe, Q.. European emission trading scheme and competitiveness: a case study on the iron and steel industry [J]. Energy Economics, 2007, 30 (4) : 2009-2027.
  • 9Rehdanz, K. , Tol, R. S. J.. Unilateral Regulation of Bilateral Trade in Greenhouse Gas Emission Permits [J]. Ecological Economics, 2005, 54(4): 397-416.
  • 10Bernard, A. , Haurie, A. , Vielle, M. , Viguier, L.. A two-level dynamic game of carbon emission trading between Russia, China, and Annex B countries [J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2007, 32(6): 1830-1856.

共引文献161

同被引文献196

引证文献24

二级引证文献90

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部