期刊文献+

松花江流域水生态环境质量评价研究 被引量:20

Study on Assessment of Water Ecosystem Quality in Songhua River Basin
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用生物完整性指数(IBI)法评价松花江流域的水生态环境质量。对25个候选生物参数进行敏感度分析、Pearson相关性分析,最终筛选出由总分类单元数、EPT分类单元数、EPT密度、敏感种分类单元比例、敏感物种数量、Hilsenhoff生物指数(HBI)6个核心参数构成的IBI评价指标。采用95%分位数法建立了IBI评价标准,将IBI评价结果划分为5个等级:大于35.84为优,26.88-35.84为良好,17.92-26.88为一般,8.96-17.92为较差,小于8.96为很差。结果表明,建立的IBI评价方法适用于松花江流域水生态环境质量评价,松花江流域各位点30.0%生物状况为优和良好,23.3%为一般;46.7%为较差和很差,说明流域内近一半区域的水生态质量存在不同程度的受损。流域生境质量主要处于一般-良好的状态;水质处于轻度污染。 The assessment of water ecosystem quality in Songhua River basin with index of biotic integrity (IBI). In this paper, the IBI was composed of six biological parameters: total taxa, EPT taxa, EPT abundance, percentage of sensitive species taxa, quantities of sensitive species,Hilsenhoff biotic index (HBI) ,which were selected from 25 candidate biological parameters in 10 reference sites and 20 monitoring sites by the sensitivity and Pearson correlation analysis. With analysis of 95% percentile, the assessment criterion of iBI was established, and the assessment result of IBI was divided into 5 grades: 〉 35.84 as excellent, 26.88-35.84 as good,17.92-26. 88 as medium; 8.96-17.92 as poor, 〈 8.96 as very poor. The results showed that the IBI was suitable for the assessment of biological quality of Songhua River basin. In Songhua River basin,30% biological status was excellent and good; 23.3% was medium; 46.7% was poor and very poor,which indicated that water ecosystem quality of nearly half of the basin presented varying degree damages. River habitat quality are in general-good conditiono Water quality was in mild pollution status.
出处 《中国环境监测》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第4期26-34,共9页 Environmental Monitoring in China
基金 国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项“流域水生态环境质量监测与评价研究”(2013ZX07502001)
关键词 完整性指数 松花江流域 水生态环境质量 Index of biotic integrity Songhua River basin water ecosystem quality
  • 相关文献

参考文献44

  • 1Poff L N , Allan D J,Bain B M , et al. The natural flowregime, a paradigm for river conservation andrestoration [ J]. Bioscience,1997,47 : 769-784.
  • 2王业耀,阴琨,杨琦,许人骥,金小伟,吕怡兵,腾恩江.河流水生态环境质量评价方法研究与应用进展[J].中国环境监测,2014,30(4):1-9. 被引量:49
  • 3Barbour M T, Gerritsen J, Snyder B D, et al. Rapid bio-assessment protocols for use in streams and wadeablerivers : pe-riphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates andfish, second edition f M ]. Washington DC: USEnviroment Protection Agency, 1999 : 1-10.
  • 4Karr J P. Assessment of biotic integrity using fishcommunities [ J]. Fisheries, 1981 ,6(6) : 21-27.
  • 5MartinGriffiths.水利部国际经济技术合作交流中心组织(译).欧盟水框架指令手册[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2008.
  • 6曾小瑱,车越,吴阿娜.3种河流健康综合性评价方法的比较[J].中国给水排水,2007,23(4):92-96. 被引量:26
  • 7Wright J F, Sutcliffe D W, Furse M T. Assessing thebiological quality of freshwaters : RIVPACS and othertechniques [ M ]. Ambleside,Cumbria, UK : FreshwaterBiological Association ,2000.
  • 8Smith M J, Kay W R,Edward H D, et al. AusRivAS :using macroinvertebrates to assess ecological conditionof rivers in Western Australia [ J ]. FreshwaterBiology, 1999,41 : 269-282.
  • 9Hart B T, Davies P E, Humphrey C L, et al.Application of the Australian river bioassessmentsystem ( AUSRIVAS) in the Brantas River, East Java,Indonesia [J]. Journal of Environmental Management.
  • 10Wright J F, Armitage P D, Furse M T. Prediction ofinverte-brate communities using stream measurements[J] . Regul Rivers : Re-search & Management, 1989,4(2) :147-155.

二级参考文献180

共引文献522

同被引文献297

引证文献20

二级引证文献129

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部