期刊文献+

Low rectal cancer:Sphincter preserving techniques-selection of patients,techniques and outcomes 被引量:13

Low rectal cancer:Sphincter preserving techniques-selection of patients,techniques and outcomes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Low rectal cancer is traditionally treated by abdominoperineal resection. In recent years, several new techniques for the treatment of very low rectal cancer patients aiming to preserve the gastrointestinal continuity and to improve both the oncological as well as the functional outcomes, have been emerged. Literature suggest that when the intersphincteric resection is applied in T1-3 tumors located within 30-35 mm from the anal verge, is technically feasible, safe, with equal oncological outcomes compared to conventional surgery and acceptable quality of life. The Anterior Perineal Plan E for Ultra-low Anterior Resection technique, is not disrupting the sphincters, but carries a high complication rate, while the reports on the oncological and functional outcomes are limited. Transanal Endoscopic Micro Surgery(TEM) and Trans Anal Minimally Invasive Surgery(TAMIS) should represent the treatment of choice for T1 rectal tumors, with specific criteria according to the NCCN guidelines and favorable pathologic features. Alternatively to the standard conventional surgery, neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy followed by TEM or TAMIS seems promising for tumors of a local stage T1sm2-3 or T2. Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision should be performed only when a board approved protocol is available by colorectal surgeons with extensive experience in minimally invasive and transanal endoscopic surgery. Low rectal cancer is traditionally treated by abdominoperinealresection. In recent years, several newtechniques for the treatment of very low rectal cancerpatients aiming to preserve the gastrointestinal continuityand to improve both the oncological as well asthe functional outcomes, have been emerged. Literaturesuggest that when the intersphincteric resection isapplied in T1-3 tumors located within 30-35 mm fromthe anal verge, is technically feasible, safe, with equaloncological outcomes compared to conventional surgeryand acceptable quality of life. The Anterior PerinealPlanE for Ultra-low Anterior Resection technique,is not disrupting the sphincters, but carries a highcomplication rate, while the reports on the oncologicaland functional outcomes are limited. TransanalEndoscopic MicroSurgery (TEM) and TransAnal MinimallyInvasive Surgery (TAMIS) should represent thetreatment of choice for T1 rectal tumors, with specificcriteria according to the NCCN guidelines and favorablepathologic features. Alternatively to the standardconventional surgery, neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapyfollowed by TEM or TAMIS seems promising for tumorsof a local stage T1sm2-3 or T2. Transanal TotalMesorectal Excision should be performed only whena board approved protocol is available by colorectalsurgeons with extensiveexperience in minimally invasiveand transanal endoscopic surgery.
机构地区 [
出处 《World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology》 SCIE CAS 2015年第7期55-70,共16页 世界胃肠肿瘤学杂志(英文版)(电子版)
关键词 Low rectal cancer SPHINCTER preservingsurgery Intersphincteric RESECTION ANTERIOR PerinealPlanE for Ultra-low ANTERIOR RESECTION of the Rectum Total mesorectal EXCISION TRANSANAL Minimally InvasiveSurgery TRANSANAL Total Mesorectal EXCISION Quality oflife Oncological OUTCOME Functional OUTCOME Low rectal cancer Sphincter preserving surgery Intersphincteric resection Anterior Perineal Plan E for Ultra-low Anterior Resection of the Rectum Total mesorectal excision TransA nal Minimally Invasive Surgery Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Quality of life Oncological outcome Functional outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献10

  • 1Wexner J. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum, 1993,36( 1 ) : 77-97.
  • 2Bacon HE. Evolution of sphincter muscle preservation and reestablishment of continuity in the operative treatment of rectal and sigmoidal cancer. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1945,81 (2):113- 127.
  • 3Parks AG. Transanal technique in low rectal anastomoses. Proc R Soc Med, 1972,65(11) :975-976.
  • 4Mason AY. Selective surgery for carcinoma of the rectum. Aust N Z J Surg, 1976,46(4):322-329.
  • 5Braun J, Treutner KH, Winkeltau K, et al. Results of intersphincteric resection of the rectum with direct coloanal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. Am J Surg, 1992,163 (3): 407 -412.
  • 6Sauer R, Fietkau R, Wittekind C, et al. Adjuvant vs neoadjuvant radiochemotherap for locally advanced rectal cancer:the German trial CAO/ARO/AIO-94. Colorectal Dis, 2003,5(5):406-415.
  • 7Kusunnoki M, Shoji Y, Yanagi H, et al. Function after anoabdominal rectal resection and colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis. Br J Surg, 1991,78(12) : 1434-1438.
  • 8Hirano A, Koda K, Kosugi C, et al. Damage to anal sphincter/ levato ani muscles by operative procedure in anal sphincter- preserving operation for rectal cancer. Am J Surg, 2011,201 (4) :508-513.
  • 9Williams NS, Murphy J, Knowles CH. Anterior perineal for ultra-low anterior resection of the rectum. Ann 2008,247 (5) : 750-758. planE Surg,.
  • 10邱辉忠,肖毅,吴斌,林国乐,吴昕.腹腔镜辅助经前会阴超低位直肠前切除术首例报道[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2011,14(1):24-26. 被引量:7

共引文献2

同被引文献83

引证文献13

二级引证文献98

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部