期刊文献+

经鼻蝶窦显微镜下和神经内镜下切除垂体腺瘤的国外经验荟萃分析 被引量:17

Transnaso-sphenoidal microsurgery and neuroendoscopic resection of pituitary adenoma: a meta- analysis of foreign experiences
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价经鼻蝶窦显微镜下和神经内镜下垂体腺瘤切除术的临床疗效。方法通过检索PubMed、WebofScience、Embase、Cochrane Library等数据库,搜集所有报道神经内镜和显微镜下手术治疗垂体腺瘤的随机对照试验或病例对照研究的英文文献,采用ReviewManager5.3软件对数据进行荟萃分析。结果经过筛选共纳入22篇文献。研究对象共计1987例患者,其中内镜组1000例,显微镜组987例。全切除率方面,采用固定效应模型合并OR值为1.62(95%CI:1.21,2.17,P=0.001);而在术后并发症方面,脑脊液漏、尿崩症、脑膜炎、鼻腔并发症两组差异均无统计学意义(均P〉0.05)。两组术后住院时间神经内镜组较显微镜组短(P〈0.05),而手术时间两组差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论根据目前已有的文献,经蝶窦神经内镜下垂体腺瘤切除术的全切除率要显著高于经鼻蝶窦显微手术。虽然在术后并发症、手术时间方面两者无明显差别,但在缩短术后住院时间方面神经内镜存在一定优势。 Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of transnaso-sphenoidal microsurgery and neuroendoscopic resection of pituitary adenoma. Methods All the English literature about the randomized controlled trials or case-control studies reporting neuroendoscopy and treatment of pituitary adenoma under the microscope were collected by searching the database, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The data were used to conduct recta-analysis using Review Manager 5. 3 software. Results A total of 22 literatures were enrolled after screening. A total of 1 987 patients were studied, including 1 000 in a neuroendoscope group and 987 in a microscope group. In terms of total resection rate, the combined odds ratio using the fixed effect model was 1.62 (95% CI 1.21 -2 17, P =0.1301 ); and in terms of postoperative complications, there were no significant differences in cerebrospinal fluid leakage, diabetes insipidus, meningitis, nasal complications between the two groups (all P 〉0. 05). The postoperative hospital stay of the neuroendoscope group was shorter than that of the microscope group (P 〈 0. 05), and there was no significant difference in operation time between the two groups (P 〉 0. 05). Conclusions According to the literature available, the total resection rate of neuroendoscopic transnaso-sphenoidal resection of pituitary adenoma was significantly higher than that of transnasal sphenoidal microsurgery. There was no significant difference between the postoperative complications and the operation time, but neuroendoscopy had some advantages for shortening the hospitalization time after procedure.
出处 《中华神经外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第9期882-887,共6页 Chinese Journal of Neurosurgery
关键词 垂体腺瘤 显微外科手术 神经内镜 荟萃分析 Pituitary adenoma Microsurgery Neuroendoscopy Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Gao Y, Zhong C, Wang Y, et al. Endoscopic versus microscopic transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgery : a meta-analysis [ J ]. World J Surg Oncol,2014,12:94.
  • 2Wells GA, Shea B, O' Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Available from: URL: http://www, ohri. ca/ programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford, htm,2008.
  • 3Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? [ J]. Control Clin Trials, 1996,17 ( 1 ) : 1-12.
  • 4Cho DY, Liau WR. Comparison of endonasal endoscopic surgery and sublabial microsurgery for prolactinomas [ J ]. Surg Neurol, 2002,58 (6) :371-375 ; discussion 375-376.
  • 5Jain AK, Gupta AK, Pathak A, et al. Excision of pituitary adenomas : randomized comparison of surgical modalities [ J ]. Br J Neurosurg,2007,21 (4) :328-331.
  • 6Koren I, Hadar T, Rappaport ZH, et al. Endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal mierosurgery versus the sublabial approach for the treatment of pituitary tumors: endonasal complications [ J ]. Laryngoscope, 1999,109 ( 11 ) : 1838-1840.
  • 7Sheehan MT, Atkinson JL, Kasperbauer JL, et al. Preliminary comparison of the endoscopic transnasal vs the sublabial transseptal approach for clinically nonfunctioning pituitary macroadenomas [ J ]. Mayo Clin Proc, 1999,74 (7) :661-670.
  • 8White DR, Sonnenburg RE, Ewend MG, et al. Safety of minimally invasive pituitary surgery (MIPS) compared with a traditional approach [ J ]. Laryngoscope ,2004,114 ( 11 ) : 1945-1948.
  • 9Cappabianca P, Alfieri A, Colao A, et al. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach: an additional reason in support of surgery in the management of pituitary lesions [ J ]. Skull Base Surg,1999,9 (2) :109-117.
  • 10Casler JD, Doolittle AM, Mair EA. Endoscopic surgery of the anterior skull base [ J ]. Laryngoscope,2005,115 ( 1 ) : 16-24.

二级参考文献27

  • 1赵继宗.我国显微神经外科的现状与进展[J].中华显微外科杂志,2005,28(2):97-98. 被引量:63
  • 2王任直,任祖渊,苏长保,杨义,马文斌,陶蔚.巨大垂体腺瘤的治疗策略[J].中华显微外科杂志,2005,28(2):106-108. 被引量:10
  • 3李春坡,王丽敏,谭振美,王志明,冯斌.内镜与显微镜下经单鼻孔蝶窦入路切除垂体瘤的比较[J].解放军医学杂志,2005,30(12):1063-1063. 被引量:4
  • 4田新华,张俊卿,陈锷,黄延林,吕新兵,刘禹冰,杨芳裕,李泉清,邓志鸿,张峰林,孙瑾,康俊龙.显微镜与神经内镜下经单鼻孔蝶窦垂体腺瘤切除术的比较[J].中华神经外科杂志,2007,23(3):182-184. 被引量:21
  • 5Hardy J.Transphenoidal microsurgery of the normal and pathological pituitary[J].Clin Neurosurg,1969,16:185-217.
  • 6Gamea A,Fathi M,El-Guindy A.The use of the rigid endoscope in trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgery[J].J Laryngol Otol,1994,108:19-22.
  • 7李锐,刘江,张黎,等.神经内镜与显微镜经单鼻孔手术治疗垂体瘤的比较研究.中国医师协会神经外科医师分会第六届全国代表大会论文汇编,南京,2011.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:116-123.
  • 8Egger M,Davey SG,Schneider M,et al.Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple,graphical test[J].BMJ,1997,315:629-634.
  • 9Mamelak AN,Carmichael J,Bonert VH,et al.Single-surgeon fully endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery:outcomes in three-hundred consecutive cases[J].Pituitary,2013,16:393-401.
  • 10Chole RA,Lim C,Dunham B,et al.A novel transnasal transsphenoidal speculum:a design for both microscopic and endoscopic transsphenoidal pituitary surgery[J].J Neurosurg,2011,114:1380-1385.

共引文献18

同被引文献117

引证文献17

二级引证文献109

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部