期刊文献+

前交通动脉囊性动脉瘤几何学指标与破裂风险的相关性研究 被引量:12

A correlation study of geometric parameters of the saccular aneurysm at the anterior communicating artery and the risk of rupture
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的通过测量分析前交通动脉瘤的几何学指标,评估其与破裂风险的相关性。方法将前交通动脉瘤分为破裂组和未破裂组,通过计算机软件测量最大瘤体长度/载瘤动脉直径(SR)、流人角(FA)、子母角(PDA)、动脉瘤体积/瘤颈面积(VOR)、A1直径/A2直径(A1/A2)、动脉瘤体积/假想最小球体积(AVSV)并应用SPSS19.0软件进行统计学分析。结果破裂组SR、VOR、A1/A2、AVSV的均值均大于未破裂组(P〈0.05),破裂组PDA小于未破裂组(P〈0.05);多因素分析结果SR、FA、PDA、VOR、A1/A2、AVSV差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论几何学指标对于评价动脉瘤破裂风险具有客观的意义,SR、VOR、A1/A2、AVSV数值越大,动脉瘤越容易破裂;PDA数值越小,动脉瘤越容易破裂。 Objective To evaluate the correlation between the anterior communicating artery aneurysm and the risk of rupture through measuring and analyzing its geometric parameters. Methods The anterior communicating artery aneurysms were divided into either a ruptured group or an unruptured group. The maximum tumor size ratio ( SR)/diameter of parent artery, flow angle (FA), parent-daughter angle (PDA), volume-to-ostium ratio (VOR), A1/A2 diameter ratio, a ratio of aneurysm volume to bounding sphere volume (AVSV) were measured by computer software, and statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS 19.0 software. Results The mean SR, VOR, A1/A2, and AVSV of the ruptured group were higher than those of the unruptured group ( P 〈 0.05 ) and PDA of the rupture group was less than that of the unruptured group (P 〈 0.05 ) ; Multivariate analysis results showed that there were no significant differences in SR, FA, PDA, VOR, A1/A2, and AVSV between the 2 groups (P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusions The geometry parameters have the objective significance for the evaluation of the risk of aneurysm rupture, and the bigger the values of SR, VOR, A1/A2, AVSV, the more easily ruptured aneurysm, and the smaller the value of PDA, the more easily ruptured aneurysm.
出处 《中华神经外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第9期923-927,共5页 Chinese Journal of Neurosurgery
关键词 前交通动脉瘤 几何学指标 破裂风险 Anterior communicating artery aneurysms Geometric parameters Rupture risk
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Vlak MH, Algra A, Brandenburg R, et al. Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, with emphasis on sex, age, comorbidity, country, and time period: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Lancet Neuro,2011,10(7) : 626-636.
  • 2Macdonald RL. Editorial: On the persisting difficulty of making predictions, especially about the future [ J ]. J Neurosurg, 2012, 116(4) :866-870.
  • 3Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneury- sms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment[J]. Lancet,2003,362(9378) : 103-110.
  • 4宋剑平,毛颖,宋冬雷,冷冰,顾宇翔.颅内囊性动脉瘤几何特征与破裂风险的关系[J].中华医学杂志,2009,89(11):732-735. 被引量:9
  • 5Ujiie H, Tamano Y, Sasaki K, et al. Is the aspect ratio a reliable index for predicting the rapture of a saccular aneurysm? [ J ].Neurosurgery ,2001,48 ( 3 ) : 495-502 ; discussion 502-503.
  • 6Raghavan ML, Ma B, Harbaugh RE. Quantified aneurysm shape and rupture risk [ J ]. J Neurosurg,2005,102 ( 2 ) : 355-362.
  • 7Rahman M, Smietana J, Hauck E, et al. Size ratio correlates with intraeranial aneurysm rupture status: a prospective study [ J ]. Stroke,2010,41 (5) : 916-920.
  • 8Dhar S, Tremmel M, Mocco J, et al. Morphology parameters for intracranial aneurysm rupture risk assessment [ J ]. Neurosurgery, 2008,63 (2) : 185-197.
  • 9Lin N, Ho A, Gross BA, et al. Differences in simple morphological variables in ruptured and unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms [ J ]. J Neurosurg ,2012,117 (5) : 913-919.
  • 10Yasuda R, Strother CM, Taki W, et al. Aneurysm volume-to- ostium area ratio: a parameter useful for discriminating the rupture status of intracranial aneurysms [ J ]. Neurosurgery,2011,68 (2) : 310-318.

二级参考文献28

  • 1Ujiie H, Tamano Y, Sasaki K, et al. Is the aspect ratio a reliable index for predicting the rupture of a saccular aneurysm? Neuresurgery,2001,48 :495 -503.
  • 2Black SPW, German WJ. Observation on the relationship between the volume and the size of the orifice of experimental aneurysms. J Neurosurg, 1960,17:984-990.
  • 3Juvela S. Prehemorrhage risk factors for fatal intracranial aneurysm rupture. Stroke,2003,34 : 1852-1857.
  • 4Wermer M, Schaaf I, Algra A, et al. Risk of rupture of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in relation to patient and aneurysm characteristics: an updated meta-analysis. Stroke , 2007,38 : 1404-1410.
  • 5International study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms-risk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention. N Engl J Med, 1998,339 : 1725-1733.
  • 6Rinkel GJ, Djibuti M, Algra A, et al. Prevalence and risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review. Stroke, 1998,29:251-256.
  • 7Weir B, Disney L, Karrison T. Sizes of ruptured and unruptured aneurysms in relation to their sites and the ages of patients. J Neurosurg,2002,96 : 64 -70.
  • 8Nader-Sepahi A, Casimiro M, Sen J, et al. Is aspect ratio a reliable predictor of intracranial aneurysm rupture? Neurosurgery, 2004,54 : 1343-1348.
  • 9Forget TR Jr, Benitez R, Veznedaroglu E, et al. A review of size and location of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery, 2001,49 : 1322-1326.
  • 10Ohashi Y, Horikoshi T, Sugita M, et al. Size of cerebral aneurysms and related factors in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Surg Neurol ,2004,61:239-247.

共引文献13

同被引文献103

  • 1Vlak MH, Algra A, Brandenburg R, et al. Prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms, with emphasis on sex, age, comorbidity, country, and time period: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Lancet Neurol,2011,10(7): 626-636. DOI:10.1016/$1474-4422(11): 70109-0.
  • 2Macdonald RL. Editorial: on the persisting difficulty of making predictions, especially about the future[J]. J Neurosurg, 2012, 116 (4):866-869. DOI:10.3171/2011.9.JNS111393.
  • 3Ho A, Lin N, Charoenvimolphan N, et al. Morphological parameters associated with ruptured posterior communicating aneurysms[J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(4): e948371-948377. DOI:10. 1371/journal.pone.0094837.
  • 4Komotar RJ, Mocco J, Solomon RA.Guidelines for the surgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: the first annual J. Lawrence pool memorial research symposium-controversies in themanagement of cerebral aneurysms[J]. Neurosurgery,2008,62(1): 183-193. DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000342785.23826.42.
  • 5Raghavan ML, Ma B, Harbaugh RE. Quantified aneurysm shape and rupture risk[J]. J Neurosurg, 2005, 102(2): 355-362.
  • 6Rahman M, Smietana J, Hauck E, et al. Size ratio correlates with intracranial aneurysm rupture status: a prospective study[J]. Stroke, 2010,41(5): 916-920. DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.574244.
  • 7Dhar S, Tremmel M, Moeeo J, et al. Morphology parameters for intracranial aneurysm rupture risk assessment[J]. Neurosurgery, 2008,63(2):185-196. DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000316847.64140.81.
  • 8Baharoglu MI,Sehirmer CM,Hoit DA,et al.Aneurysm inflow-angle as a discriminant for rupture in sidewall cerebral aneurysms: morphometric and computational fluid dynamic analysis[J]. Stroke, 2010,41(7):1423. DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.570770.
  • 9Yasuda R, Strother CM, Taki W, et al. Aneurysm volume-to-ostium area ratio: a parameter useful for discriminating the rupture status of intracranial aneurysms[J]. Neurosurgery,2011, 68(2): 310-317. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182010ed0.
  • 10Lin N, Ho A, Gross BA, et al. Differences in simple morphological variables in ruptured and unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms[J]. J Neurosurg, 2012, 117(5): 913-919. DOI:10.3171/ 2012.7.JNS111766.

引证文献12

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部