期刊文献+

薄层特超稠油油藏双水平井SAGD开发指标预测模型 被引量:1

Predictive models of dual horizontal well SAGD for thin formation and super heavy oil reservoirs
下载PDF
导出
摘要 指出蒸汽辅助重力泄油(steam assisted gravity drainage,SAGD)开发技术具有采收率较高、投资多和风险大的特点,适用于油层较厚、原油黏度非常大及常规热采开发方式无法经济有效开发的稠油油藏.本研究采用数值模拟和经济评价方法,结合影响因素对SAGD开发效果的影响,建立各影响因素与开发效果的单因素定量关系;并利用多元非线性回归方法,建立SAGD采收率在不同油价下内部收益率与影响因素之间的多因素预测模型.研究结果表明,油层厚度、地层原油黏度、平面渗透率、垂向渗透率和初始含油饱和度是影响SAGD开发效果的主要因素;该预测模型能够适应国际油价变化,而且,通过国外SAGD典型区块实例验证具有较强的实用性和油藏适应性. Steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) technology, with the problems of large investment and high risks, despite higher recovery compared with other technologies, is more applicable to heavy oil reservoirs with thicker formation and larger oil viscosity, which common thermal methods are difficult to deal with. This paper investigates the effects of influential factors on SAGD development and introduces quantitative models between each influential factor and development index. The multiple factors regression predictive models are established to predict the SAGD oil efficiency and the internal rate of return under different oil prices. The results exhibit effects of different influencial factors including formation thickness, formation oil viscosity, plane permeability, vertical permeability and initial oil saturation, on the efficiency of SAGD. The proposed predictive models can be compatible with effects of international oil price variation. The models have been applied to a typical field of SAGD abroad to verify the applicability and accuracy of the models in engineering.
出处 《深圳大学学报(理工版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期473-479,共7页 Journal of Shenzhen University(Science and Engineering)
基金 国家重大科技专项重点资助项目(2011ZX05011) 中国石化股份公司科研资助项目(P13055)~~
关键词 油气田开发工程 薄层稠油 蒸汽辅助重力泄油 预测模型 采收率 内部收益率 oil and gas field development engineering heavy oil with thin formation steam assisted gravity drainage predictive model oil recovery internal rate of return
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Butler R M. Some recent developments in SAGD [ J ].Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 2001,40( 1 ):18-22.
  • 2Gates I D,Kenny J, Hemandez-Hdez I L, et al. Steam-injection strategy and energetics of steam-assisted gravitydrainage [ J]. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering,2007, 35(6) : 19-34.
  • 3Li P, Vink A, Nespor K, et al. Partial SAGD applicationsin the Jackfish SAGD project [ J ]. Journal of CanadianPetroleum Technology, 2011, 11(45): 19-31.
  • 4刘敏,高孝田,邹剑,李萍.海上特稠油热采SAGD技术方案设计[J].石油钻采工艺,2013,35(4):94-96. 被引量:19
  • 5Ito Y , Chen J. Numerical history match of the burnt lakeSAGD process [ J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Tech-nology, 2010,49(5) : 40-49.
  • 6霍进,桑林翔,樊玉新,魏新春,邱敏,王景.风城超稠油双水平井蒸汽辅助重力泄油开发试验[J].新疆石油地质,2012,33(5):570-573. 被引量:40
  • 7李景玲,朱志宏,窦升军,陈森.双水平井SAGD循环预热传热计算及影响因素分析[J].新疆石油地质,2014,35(1):82-86. 被引量:5
  • 8Yuan Jianyang, McFarlane R. Evaluation of steam circula-tion strategies for SAGD stamp [ J ]. Journal of CanadianPetroleum Technology, 2011, 25(4) : 20-31.
  • 9Shin H, Polikar M. Review of reservoir parameters to opti-mize SAGD and fast-SAGD operating conditions [ J ].Petroleum Society, 2004, 12(4) : 1-10.
  • 10席长丰,马德胜,李秀峦.双水平井超稠油SAGD循环预热启动优化研究[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2010,32(4):103-108. 被引量:40

二级参考文献67

共引文献120

同被引文献13

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部