摘要
目的研究分析心血管内科急性心绞痛患者的治疗方法,对患者的临床治疗效果进行探讨分析。方法选取我院接收的100例急性心绞痛患者来进行研究分析,将其分组为对照组和观察组,均有50例患者,对照组患者使用常规治疗,观察组患者使用常规治疗以及氯吡格雷药物。对两组患者的临床治疗效果对比分析。结果经过治疗后,观察组患者的急性心绞痛临床治疗有效率是84%,对照组的治疗有效率是64%,两组的治疗有效率之间存在统计学差异性,P<0.05。结论急性心绞痛患者除了使用常规治疗之外,还增加氯吡格雷药物治疗具有比较好的效果,临床中疗效突出,患者的生活质量改善明显。
ObjectiveTo study the treatment method of acute cardiovascular department of internal medicine analysis in patients with angina pectoris,analysed on the patient's clinical treatment effect. Methods100 patients with acute angina patients in our hospital received to carry on the research analysis,patients in the control group used routine treatment,patients in the observation group use routine treatment and clopidogrel.Results The effective rate was 84% in clinical observation of treatment of acute angina pectoris patients,the effective rate of treatment group was 64%,treatment of the two groups has statistical difference between efficiency,P〈0.05.ConclusionThe patients with acute angina pectoris in addition to the use of conventional treatment, increased clopidogrel therapy has better effect,prominent clinical curative effect,the quality of life of the patients improved obviously,compared to promote widespread use in clinical.
出处
《中国卫生标准管理》
2015年第8期107-108,共2页
China Health Standard Management
关键词
心血管内科
氯吡格雷
急性心绞痛
临床疗效
Cardiovascular department of internal medicine
Clopidogrel
Acute angina pectoris
Clinical effect