期刊文献+

提示对3~11岁儿童解决类比推理问题的影响 被引量:3

The Influences of Hints 3 ~ 11 Years Old Children's Performance on Analogical Reasoning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随机抽取360名3~11岁儿童,采用几何图形、关系图形、词语、数字、故事五种材料,考察提示对儿童类比推理的影响。结果发现:(1)提示对3~4岁和8~9岁儿童几何图形类比推理成绩有影响;提示对3~4岁和9~11岁儿童词语类比推理成绩有影响;提示对3~11岁儿童数字类比推理成绩均有影响;提示对3岁和8~11岁儿童关系图形类比推理成绩有影响;提示对3~4岁和8~11岁儿童故事类比推理成绩有影响;(2)提示使原本不会类比推理的3岁儿童能够初步进行类比推理。 Randomly selected 360 children aged 3 ~ 11, this study used five kinds of materials including geometry, relational graphics, words, numbers and stores to investigate hints influence on children' s analogical reasoning. The results showed that: ( 1 ) Hints influenced 3 ~ 4 years old children' s performance on geometry analogical reasoning; Hints influenced 3 ~ 4 years old and 9 ~ 11 years old children' s performance on word analogical reasoning; Hints influenced 3 ~ 11 years old children' s performance on number analogical reasoning; Hints influenced 3 years old and 8 ~ 11 years old children' s performance on relations graphics analogical reasoning; Hints influenced 3 ~4 years old and 8 ~ 11 years old children' s performance on story analogical reasoning; (2) Hints made 3 years old children who couldn' t use analogy reasoning learred to conduct some preliminary analogy reasoning.
出处 《心理发展与教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第5期578-585,共8页 Psychological Development and Education
基金 广东省教育科研"十一五"规划2011年度研究项目(2011TJK359)
关键词 儿童 类比推理 提示 Children Analogical reasoning Hints
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

  • 1Alexander, P. A., Wilson, A. F., White, C. S., Willson, V. L., Tallent, M. K. , & Shutes, R. E. 1987, Effects of teacher training on children' s analogical reasoning performance. Teaching & Teacher Education,3 (4), 275 - 285.
  • 2Antonietti, A. 1991, Effects of partial analogies on solving an ill- defined problem. Psychological Reports ,68, 947 - 960.
  • 3Antonietti,A. , & Gioletta, M. A. 1995, Individual differences in analogical problem solving. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 6i 1 - 619.
  • 4Chen,Z. ( 1996), Children' s analogical transfer: Effects of superficial, structural and procedural similarity. Journal of ExperimentalChild Psychology, 62, 410 - 431.
  • 5Chen,Z. 1999, Schema induction in children's analogical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91,703 - 715.
  • 6Chen,Z. 2002, Analogical problem solving: A hierarchical analysis of procedural similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 81 -98.
  • 7Chen, Z., & Daehler, M. W. 1992, Intention and outcome: Keycomponents of causal structure facilitating mapping in children' s analogical transfer. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 53 ( 3 ) , 237 - 257.
  • 8Christie, S. , & Gentner, D. 2007, Relational similarity in identity relation: The role of language. In Vosniadou, S. & Kayser, D. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second European Cognitive Science Conference.
  • 9Crisafi, M.A. , & Brown, A. L. (1986), Analogical transfer in very young children: Combining two separately learned solutions to reach a goal. Child Development ,57, 953 -968.
  • 10Daehler, M. W., & Chcn, Z. 1993, Protagonist, theme, and goal object: Effects of surface features on analogical transfer. Cognitive Development, 8(2), 211 -229.

二级参考文献211

共引文献82

同被引文献29

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部