期刊文献+

论鲁迅行文中的一处错误——从《鲁迅全集》两个注释的疏漏谈起

An Error by Lu Xun Based on Two Careless Annotations of The Complete Works of Lu Xun
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《阿Q正传》在报刊上完成连载的次月,周作人便已写出评论文章。该文发表前鲁迅曾经亲自看过,并大体上予以认可。后来,鲁迅在一篇文章中还专门引述过周作人认为《阿Q正传》是"讽刺"和"冷嘲"的观点。问题在于,鲁迅在该文中明确指出此观点是在《阿Q正传》编入《呐喊》出版之后方才出现的,然而正式出版的时间是1923年8月,较之周作人发表论文的1922年3月已经相隔一年有余,藉此可以证明鲁迅在行文中出现了错误。 Zhou Zuoren wrote a critical essay as soon as The True Story ofAh Q was serialized in the newspaper. Lu Xun read the article before it was published. Later, Lu Xun mentioned that Zhou Zuoren thought of The True Story ofAh Q as a novel of "irony" and "fleer". But the question is the time inconsistency arising from the novel and the article respectively written by the Zhou Brothers. Lu Xun made it clear that his brother's viewpoint appeared after his novel was published, but in fact it had been published one year earlier. From this, we can conclude that there was a mistake in Lu xun's article.
作者 田丰
出处 《东方论坛(青岛大学学报)》 2015年第4期38-41,共4页 Eastern Forum(JOURNAL OF QINGDAO UNIVERSITY)
关键词 鲁迅 《鲁迅全集》 注释 行文错误 Lun Xun Complete Works ofLu Xun annotation error in writing
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1鲁迅.俄文译本《阿Qt传》序及著者自叙传略[A].鲁迅全集:第7卷[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1981.
  • 2周作人.关于阿Q正传[A].鲁迅的青年时代[M].北京:中国青年出版社,1957.
  • 3张定璜.鲁迅先生[J].现代评论,1925,(7-8).
  • 4天用.桌话:六、“呐喊”[J].文学旬刊,1924,(145).
  • 5曾秋士.关于鲁迅先生[J].晨报副刊,1924-01-20.
  • 6雁冰.致吕兆棠[J].小说月报,1922,(13)(11).
  • 7文学书介绍:呐喊[J].晨报副刊,1924-07-11.
  • 8书报介绍:呐喊(鲁迅著)[J].学生杂志,1925,(12)(1).
  • 9郁达夫.回忆鲁迅[A].郁达夫谈鲁迅全编[M].上海:上海文化出版社,2006.
  • 10谭国棠.通信[J].小说月报,1922,(13)(2).

共引文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部