期刊文献+

心脏自主神经病变(DCAN)合并糖尿病患者的危险因素分析 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析心脏自主神经病变(DCAN)合并糖尿病患者的危险因素。方法选取50例DCAN合并糖尿病患者为观察组,均实施血脂分析,胰岛素释放及葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)等,使用Ewing试验对DCAN进行诊断,分析患者的自身情况及其危险因素。选取20例正常糖耐量人员为对照组。结果观察组CAN患病率56%,对照组5%,2组比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.001)。观察组病程<5a患者中,其DCAN患病率43.75%,病程>5a为77.8%,比较差异具有统计学意义(P=0.05)。收缩压,心率,空腹时胰岛素水平,尿酸以及胰岛素的分泌指数和抵抗指数(HOMA-β)等方面,2组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。胰岛素的抵抗指数>5.3,收缩压>140mmHg(1mmHg=0.133kPa),尿酸>350μmol/L,静息时心率>80次/min,空腹时胰岛素水平>100pmol/L,胰岛素的分泌指数>102.65的患者,其DCAN患病率同对照组比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 CAN在糖尿病患者中患病率较高,其中独立危险因素包括尿酸、HbA1c、HOMA-IR。
作者 魏远福
出处 《中国实用神经疾病杂志》 2015年第18期48-49,105,共3页 Chinese Journal of Practical Nervous Diseases
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Aytemir K, AksoyekS,Ozer N,et al. QT dispersion and auto nomic nervous system function in patients with type 1 diabetes [J]. International Journal of Cardiology,2012,65(1) ..45-50.
  • 2Fallo F, Maffei P, Dalla Pozza A, et al. Cardiovascular autonom- ic function in Cushing's syndrome. [J]. Journal of Endoerinolog- ical Investigation, 2011,32 (1) : 41-45.
  • 3Witte DR, Tesfaye S, Chaturvedi N, et al. Risk factors for cardi- ac autonomic neuropathy in type 1 diabetes mellitus. [J]. Dia betologia,2012,48(1) :164-171.
  • 4Valensi P, Sachs RN, H arfouche B, et al. Predictive value of c ardiac autonomic neuropathy in diabetic patients with or with- out silent myocardial ischemia. [J]. Diabetes care,2011,24(2) : 339-343.
  • 5Massin MM, Derkenne B, Tallsund My et al. Cardiac autonomic dysfunction in diabetic children. [J]. Diabetes care, 1999, 22 (11):1 845-1 850.
  • 6王志军,吴寿岭.糖尿病合并高血压病患者的危险因素及随访分析[J].中华内分泌代谢杂志,2013,29(2):120-124. 被引量:20
  • 7赵巧玲,谢新荣,邹汶兵,赵妮,余天强.2型糖尿病足部自主神经病变的危险因素[J].广东医学,2014,35(3):405-406. 被引量:15

二级参考文献31

  • 1黎雅清,李路.2型糖尿病患者心率变异度与糖尿病肾病的关系[J].中华肾脏病杂志,2005,21(6):344-344. 被引量:10
  • 2Dagenais GR, St-Pierre A, Gilbert P, et al. Comparison of prognosis formen with type 2 diabetes mellitus and men with cardiovascular disease. CMAJ, 2009,180:40-47.
  • 3Nemes A, Balazs E, Csan6dy M, et al. Long-term prognostic role of coronary flow velocity reserve in patients with aortic valve stenosis- insights from the SZEGED Study. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging, 2009, 29:447-452.
  • 4Everett C J, Frithsen I, Player M. Relationship of polyehlorinated biphenyls with type 2 diabetes and hypertension. J Environ Monit, 2011,13:241-251.
  • 5Cushman WC, Evans GW, Byington RP, et al. The ACCORD Study Group. Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type2diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med, 2010,362 : 1575-1585.
  • 6Venskutonyte L, Malmberg K, Norhammar A, et al. Effect of gender on prognosis in patients with myocardial infarction and type 2 diabetes. J Intern Med, 2010,268:75-82.
  • 7Vidal-Perez R, Otero-Ravifia F, Grigorian-Shamagian L, et al. Sex does not influence prognosis in diabetic patients. The Barbanza Diabetes study. Rev Esp Cardiol, 2010,63 : 170-180.
  • 8Goode AD, Winkler EA, Lawler SP, et al. A telephone-delivered physical activity and dietary intervention for type 2 diabetes and hypertension: does intervention dose influence outcomes? Am J Health Promot, 2011,25:257-263.
  • 9Madden KM, Lockhart C, Potter TF, et al. Aerobic training restores arterial baroreflex sensitivity in older adults with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia. Clin J Sport Med, 2010,20 : 312-317.
  • 10El-Menyar A, Zubaid M, Shehab A, et al. Prevalence and impact of cardiovascular risk factors among patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome in the middle East. Clin Cardiol, 2011,34:51-58.

共引文献32

同被引文献22

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部