摘要
为探讨作答方式对考生答题过程的影响,验证听写题型的效度,采用即时追述和访谈的研究方法,对36名EFL考生短文听写时的答题过程进行分析。研究表明:虽然四组考生听写的总体得分差异并不显著,但在答题过程中使用母语作答的第三组考生使用了更多的策略,能较好地理解输入的信息和短文大意,并受与构念无关的因素影响较小,而第四组受试在没有语境的情况下,对语义的理解不深刻,使用的策略最少,测验材料没有较好的效度和区分度。另外,四组考生的实际答题表现与听写的指令要求也并不一致,表明指令的合理性存在问题。
The study investigates the processes of 36 EFL test-takers in completing a compound dictation test through analysis of their verbal protocols obtained immediately after the test and retrospective interviews, to explore whether and how different response formats affect their test-taking processes and validity of this test. Findings are as follows : four group test-takers'actual performance does not re- late to the instructions given in the dictation test, which may raise doubts over the effectiveness of the instructions, posing a potential threat to test validity. Testees of G3 tend to use various strategies to have a better understanding of the listening input, and they ap- peared to be less influenced by construct-irrelevant factors, which proved the validity of listening test. While G4 testees'understanding of information and strategy use was the least, their test appeared not to have good validity and differentiation.
出处
《信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2015年第5期29-33,共5页
Journal of Xinyang Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基金
河南省软科学研究项目(142400411204)
河南城建学院科学研究基金项目(2015JYB029)
关键词
CET-4
短文听写
测试方式
答题过程
CET-4
compound dictation
response formats
test-taking processes