期刊文献+

创业板上市公司董事结构对R&D投入的影响

Influence of types of Directors of Companies Listed on GEM on R&D Investment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 创新性是创业板上市公司最重要的特征,其中制造业上市公司在创业板中所占的比例达到66%左右。以创业板上市公司2009—2013年年报数据为样本,实证研究了创业板上市公司及其制造业企业治理结构中,不同董事类型结构对公司R&D投入的影响与差异。研究结果表明,创业板上市公司及其制造型企业R&D投入与内部董事结构显著正相关,与关联董事结构显著负相关;而在独立董事结构与R&D投入的关系方面,创业板上市制造企业与创业板整体样本表现出不同的异质性效应,但不显著。 Innovation is the most important feature in the companies listed on GEM, in which the share of the manufacturing companies listed on GEM accounts for about 66%. This paper selected the annual report data of companies listed on GEM in 2009--2013 ,compared and analyzed the different influences between the proportion of R&D investment and the different type of the directors structure in the companies listed on GEM and the manufacturing companies listed on the GEM Corpo- rate Governance Structure. The results show that throughout the companies listed on GEM and the manufacturing companies listed on the GEM, there is a significant positive effect between the proportion of R&D investment and inside director struc- ture, there is a negative effect between the proportion of R&D investment and the associate director structure;but in the as- pect of the relationship between the independent director and the proportion of R&D investment, the manufacturing compa- nies listed on the GEM exhibit different effects of heterogeneity, but not significant.
出处 《技术与创新管理》 2015年第5期443-448,511,共7页 Technology and Innovation Management
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71371111) 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助课题(20133718110009) 山东省博士后创新项目专项资金资助项目(201403008) 山东科技大学科研创新团队(2011KYTU104)
关键词 创业板 董事结构 R&D投入 GEM types of directors R&D investment
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1刘新民,王垒,康旺霖.创业企业IPO董事会结构对研发资源投入的影响研究[J].研究与发展管理,2014,26(4):32-41. 被引量:11
  • 2刘新民,王垒.上市公司高管更替模式对企业绩效的影响[J].南开管理评论,2012,15(2):101-107. 被引量:22
  • 3Chung K, Wright P, Kedia B. Corporate governance and market valuation of capital and R& D investments [ J ]. Review of Financial Economics ,2003,12 (2) : 161 - 172.
  • 4Boone A, Field L, Karpoff J. The determinants of corporate board size and composition : An empirical analysis [ C ]// SSRN Working Paper. Philadelphia: AFA 2005 Philadel- phia Meetings ,2005.
  • 5Mcconnell J, Servaes H. Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value [J].Journal of Financial E- conomics, 1990,27 : 595 - 612.
  • 6Cotter J, Shivdasani A, Zenner M. Do independent direc- tors enhance target shareholder wealth during tender of- fers? [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1997,43 (2) : 195 -218.
  • 7周杰,薛有志.公司内部治理机制对R&D投入的影响——基于总经理持股与董事会结构的实证研究[J].研究与发展管理,2008,20(3):1-9. 被引量:61
  • 8Hoskisson R, Hitt M, Johnson R. Conflicting voices:The effects o f institutional ownership heterogeneity and inter- nal governance on corporate innovation strategies [ J ]. A- cademy of Management Journal, 2002,45 (4) : 697 - 716.
  • 9Mason A. Internationalization and firm governance:The roles of CEO Compensation, top team compositions, and board structure [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 1998(41 ) :158 - 178.
  • 10徐金发,刘翌.企业治理结构与技术创新[J].科研管理,2002,23(4):11-15. 被引量:26

二级参考文献173

共引文献713

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部