期刊文献+

大学生学习成果评价的新途径--EPP(中国)批判性思维能力试测报告 被引量:35

A New Approach to Evaluate College Student Learning Outcomes——Pilot Test Report of EPP(Chinese Version)Critical Thinking
原文传递
导出
摘要 从20世纪80年代以来,"学生学习成果评价"日益成为高等教育质量评价研究的热点问题。在美国影响最大的一项大学生学习成果标准化测试——ETS水平轮廓测试汉化后形成的EPP(中国)批判性思维能力测试,信度与效度良好,对中国高等院校具有适用性,为我国高等教育质量评价开拓了新的视角和途径。 Since 1980s, student learning outcomes assessment has become a core theme of quality evaluation of higher education. As one of the most influential tests in this field, the critical thinking test of the ETS Proficiency Profile, is translated and applied in China according to concrete situation. It is found that the reliability and validity of ETS Proficiency Profile (Chinese Version) are good, and it is applicable to Chinese College students. Furthermore, ETS Proficiency Profile (Chinese Version) provides a new approach to evaluate student learning outcomes at Chinese higher education institutions.
出处 《教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第9期64-71,118,共9页 Educational Research
基金 美国教育考试服务中心(ETS)与北京航空航天大学联合研究项目“EPP(中国)测试和研发”的阶段性研究成果
关键词 中国大学生 学习成果评价 EPP(中国) 批判性思维能力 Chinese college students, learning outcomes assessment, ETS Proficiency Profile (Chinese Version),critical thinking
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1黄海涛.美国“学生学习成果评估”研究评析[J].清华大学教育研究,2011,32(2):119-124. 被引量:21
  • 2Richard J. Shavelson. Measuring College Learning Responsibly[ M ]. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 2001.2 I--44.
  • 3Dewey J. How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educational Process [M]. Lexington: Heath Publishing. 1933.21-53.
  • 4National Education Goals Panel. The national edueationgoals report[M]. Washington: U. S. GovemmentPrint ion office. 1991.4-10.
  • 5张梅,印勇.美国批判性思维研究及其启示[J].重庆大学学报(社会科学版),2012,18(6):154-157. 被引量:26
  • 6American Philosophical Association. Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus forPurposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction [EB/OL]. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulhext/ ED315423.pdf.2.1990-12-31;.
  • 7黄海涛.美国高等教育中的“学生学习成果评估”:内涵与特征[J].高等教育研究,2010,31(7):97-104. 被引量:132
  • 8张建功,杨怡斐.美国高校学生学习成果评估模型研究[J].高等工程教育研究,2013,61(4):116-121. 被引量:14
  • 9ETS. ETS Proficiency Profile User' s Guide [EB/OL]. https ://www.ets.org/s/proficiencyprofile/pdf/Users Guide.pdf. 2010-06-21.
  • 10Bond, T. G. & Fox, C. M.. Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in human sciences [M]. Mahwah: Erlbaum.2001.35-56.

二级参考文献78

  • 1刘尧.中国高等教育评估的问题、对策与发展趋势[J].高教发展与评估,2006,22(6):1-6. 被引量:32
  • 2缪四平.美国批判性思维运动对大学素质教育的启发[J].清华大学教育研究,2007,28(3):99-105. 被引量:101
  • 3E·格威狄·博格.金伯利·宾汉·霍尔.高等教育中的质量与问责[M].毛亚庆,刘冷馨,译.北京:北京师范大学出版社,2008:242.
  • 4彭森明.将学生学习成果纳入大学评鉴指标项目之必要性与可行性.评鉴(台湾),2008,(15).
  • 5ACT. (2009). CAAP guide to successful general education outcomes assessment. Iowa City, IA: ACT.
  • 6College Board (2008). Trends in college pricing. New York: Author.
  • 7Educational Testing Service (2007). MAPP user's guide. Princeton, N J: ETS.
  • 8Klein, S., Liu, O.L., Sconing, J., Bolus, R., Bridgeman, B., Kugelmass, H., Nemeth, A., Robbins, S., & Steedle, J. (September 29, 2009). Test Validity Study (TVS) Report. Supported by the Fund for Improvement of Postsecondary Education (FIPSE). Online at: http://www.voluntarysystem.org/index.cfm?page=researcb.
  • 9Klein, S., Benjamin, R., Shavelson, R., & Bolus, R. (2007). The Collegiate Learning Assessment: Facts and Fantasies. Evaluation Review, 31(5), 415-439.
  • 10Liu, O. L. (2009a). Measuring value-added in higher education: Conditions and caveats. Results from using the Measure of Academic Proficiency and Progress (MAPP^TM). Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(6), 1-14.

共引文献188

同被引文献289

引证文献35

二级引证文献236

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部