期刊文献+

法理的救赎——互惠原理在管制性征收案件中的适用 被引量:15

The Redemption by Jurisprudence: The Application of the Reciprocity Rationale to Regulatory Impostion Cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 政府管制的利益不可能匀质分布,很容易遭到管制性征收规则的阻遏。互惠原理可以适当磨平征收规则的刚性棱角,在法理上扮演救赎的角色。互惠原理在美国经历了经济互惠和社会互惠两个阶段,分别形成各自的规则。北京的汽车单双号限行常态化措施符合社会互惠原理,不构成管制性征收。 The benefit of government regulation cannot be distributed homogeneously, which is easily pre- vented by the rules of regulato tion, where the Jurisprudence ry pl imposition. The reciprocity rationale can properly soften the rules of imposiays a redemptive role. The Reciprocity Rationale in America has been through two stages-economic reciprocity and social reciprocity, which separately form its own rules. The normalization of even-odd license plate method in Peking is consistent with the rationale of social reciprocity, and thus does not constitute a regulatory imposition.
作者 刘连泰
机构地区 厦门大学法学院
出处 《现代法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第4期64-76,共13页 Modern Law Science
关键词 法理 互惠原理 平均利益互惠 管制性征收 jurisprudence reciprocity rationale average reciprocity of advantage regulatory imposition
  • 相关文献

参考文献45

  • 1张翔.基本权利限制问题的思考框架[J].法学家,2008(1):134-139. 被引量:117
  • 2“Nor shall private property be taken for public use,without just compensation.”U.S.CONST.AMEND.V.
  • 3Pennsylvania Coal Co.v.Mahon,260 U.S.393,415(1922).
  • 4刘连泰.政府对拟征收不动产的管制[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2014,32(2):97-105. 被引量:5
  • 5Armstrong v.United States,364 U.S.40,49(1960).
  • 6王俊豪,鲁桐,王永利.西方国家的政府管制俘虏理论及其评价[J].世界经济,1998,21(4):25-28. 被引量:23
  • 7Christopher Supino,The Police Power and“Public Use”:Balancing the Public Interest against Private Rights through Principled Constitutional Distinctions,in W.Va.L.Rev.110(2007-2008).
  • 8Joseph L.Sax.Takings,Private Property,and Public Rights[J].Yale Law Review,1971,81(2):150.
  • 9Walter Block,Guillermo Yeatts.The Economics and Ethics of Land Reform:A Critique of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace’s“toward a Better Distribution of Land:The Challenge of Agrarian Reform[J].Journal of Natural Resources&Environmental Law,1999-2000,15(1):60.
  • 10Jed Rubenfeld.Usings[J].Yale Law Review,1993,102(5):1099-1100.

二级参考文献101

共引文献465

同被引文献242

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部