知识图谱研究的脉络、流派与趋势——基于SSCI与CSSCI期刊论文的计量与可视化

History,Schools and Trend in Knowledge Map:Investigation and Visualization Based on SSCI and CSSCI

知识图谱作为快速兴起和发展的跨学科研究领域,在国内外不同学科间的发展轨迹、研究重点等方面总体上存在差异。适时梳理国内外该领域发展历史上的重要理论和技术发展轨迹,明晰核心人物和团队,可为当前和今后基于知识图谱的可视化研究提供理论基础。本文选取1998—2014年间SSCI、CSSCI中以知识图谱为主题的期刊论文,以SATI、UCINET、Net Draw、Cite Space等为数据分析和可视化工具,通过时间分布揭示该领域发展的阶段特征,通过节点性论文计算和高频关键词共现分析揭示该领域发展的内容分布,从而厘清其发展脉络;从学科分布、核心期刊和边缘期刊的判别揭示该领域发展的跨学科概貌,通过核心作者综合指数计算、合作分析和机构分析揭示该领域研究的人物关系,厘清其发展流派。在此基础上提出知识图谱研究的弱化与主题的衍生、知识图谱的跨学科研究与应用和知识创造者的合作创新三个发展趋势。图11。表3。参考文献29。

As an interdisciplinary research field with rapid development, the history and focuses of knowledge map are of great difference between domestic and foreign academia in different disciplines. This article has done a comprehensive research on important theoretical schools, technological development trails, research focuses, core researchers and organizations by implementing theories and methods of knowledge map.The methods of informetrics analysis are used on the knowledge map related journal articles in Social Science Citation Index（ SSCI） and China Social Science Citation Index（ CSSCI） from 1998 to 2014,using the tools of SATI、UCINET、Net Draw、Cite Space. Results are shown specifically according to development phases, node articles, highly cited papers, disciplinary distribution, core authors and core journals, high frequency keyword co-ocurrence, author co-citation and keyword network, to reveal the distribution characteristics of time, content and disciplines of knowledge map research and to draw a picture of the development of schools, interdisciplinary study and contributions made by library and information academia by analyzing and computing comprehensive index of core authors, finally to propose the development trend of this field.The main findings of this article are as follows： 1） 2008- 2012 is the period of rapid development and the year 2012 celebrated the most harvest of research achievements and then researches began to decline gradually. We can divide four phases of domestic and international research and the research trail follows a pattern of theory research—implication research—implication expansion of theory and technology—expansion of implication fields. 2） Research focuses of domestic and international academia are alike in combining research of knowledge map with knowledge management, information retrieval and ontology. The two technology and implication research schools are formed internationally while there formed informetrics and implication schools domestically. 3） The research trend includes the weakening and derivation of the knowledge map research, more interdisciplinary research and application research and more cooperation and innovation of knowledge creators.Knowledge map is a fusion of natural science and social science in the multi-disciplinary field of research and application, and because of the incompatibilities of social science and natural science journal citation data at home and abroad, this study is conducted only based on articles in the field of social science journals. The follow-up study should be spread to other subjects to draw more comprehensive results.This article provides new theoretical research angles and data to master the development trail of knowledge map through summarization of its venation, genre and trend. This article also can support the library and information academia to promote creative research and implication of knowledge map, such as research on knowledge organization based on citation analysis, intelligent aggregation of internet information resource of specific fields, construction of classification system and evaluation of internet information resource, and so on.This article has made a comprehensive, integrated, systematical analysis on knowledge map research at home and abroad and investigated time axis, research focus, schools, core researchers and organizations,co-research relationship, and revealed relationship between researchers by computing co-author comprehensive index. 11 figs. 3 tabs. 29 refs.