期刊文献+

亚里士多德与庄子人生“至境”之比较

A Comparative Study of Two Doctrines of Life's Highest State between Aristotle and Chuang-Tzu
下载PDF
导出
摘要 人生至境是人对理想生活处境的终极性描绘,也是先哲们求解人生问题的重要体现。作为中西文明的重要思想者,亚里士多德与庄子都对此给予了丰富的阐释。立足跨文化的比较视域,两位先哲的人生至境可相应地从5大维度进行比照:样态形式——"闲暇"与"逍遥";通达途径——"沉思"与"坐忘";价值旨趣——"至乐"与"无用之用";理智角色——"崇智"与"去智"以及人格形象——"完人"与"至人"。虽然亚里士多德与庄子均将人生至境指向了内在精神性的自由之境,但在5个维度上都既有相通性又有差异性,从而在一定程度上体现了中西文化于始源点上的汇通与分野。 The highest state of life is not only an ultimate portrayal of the ideal life situation, but is an important point for the ancient philosopher to answer the essence of life. As the founders of western or eastern civilization, Aristotle and Chuang-Tzu gave a rich explanation about the highest state of life. Based on the intercultural perspectives, there are five dimensions to compare their thoughts : patterns or forms ( leisure--shiao Yao ) , ways of access ( contemplation and sitting in forgetfulness ) , value orientation ( su- preme happiness and futility of utility ), roles of intellect ( intellectualism and anti-intellectualism) and ideal personality ( perfect man and imperial person). All of these comparisons indicate that the two philosophers share in some aspects but differe in others, though both of them think that the highest state of life could be boiled down to spiritual freedom. Of course, it also to some extent reflects the similarities and differences of the starting point of cultures.
作者 黄传根
出处 《南华大学学报(社会科学版)》 2015年第4期63-67,共5页 Journal of University of South China(Social Science Edition)
基金 国家留学基金管理委员会资助
关键词 亚里士多德 庄子 闲暇 逍遥 至境 Aristotle Chuang-Tzu leisure shiao Yao highest state of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1[古希腊]亚里士多德.尼各马科伦理学[M]∥苗力田.亚里士多德全集:卷8.北京:中国人民大学出版社.1992.
  • 2[古希腊]亚里士多德.政治学[M]//苗力田.亚里士多德全集:第9卷.北京:中国人民大学出版社,1994.
  • 3叶智魁.Aristotle的休闲观之探析--兼论善、幸福与休闲的关系[J].户外游憩研究,2004,17(1):63-85.
  • 4Joseph Owens. Aristotle On Leisure[ J]. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 1981,11 ( 4 ) :720.
  • 5王云,李丽.亚里士多德闲暇思想论析[J].海南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2011,29(4):33-37. 被引量:2
  • 6陈鼓应.庄子今注今译[M].北京:中华书局,1983.779.
  • 7邬昆如.道家哲学与欧洲哲学之比较[J].哲学杂志,1994(7):16.
  • 8王志楣.《庄子》逍遥义辨析[J].政大中文学报,2007(8):62.
  • 9Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics [ M ]. M. Ostward ( trans. ). New York: The Library of Liberal Art, 1962.
  • 10苗力田.思辨是最大的幸福──亚里士多德《尼各马科伦理学》新版译序[J].哲学研究,1998(12):50-56. 被引量:24

二级参考文献43

共引文献776

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部