期刊文献+

COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR DIRECTED STRUCTURE TOPOLOGY OPTIMIZATION 被引量:1

COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR DIRECTED STRUCTURE TOPOLOGY OPTIMIZATION
原文传递
导出
摘要 To compensate for the imperfection of traditional bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization, material interpolation scheme and sensitivity filter functions are introduced. A suitable filter can overcome the checkerboard and mesh-dependency. And the historical information on accurate elemental sensitivity numbers are used to keep the objective function converging steadily. Apart from rational intervals of the relevant important parameters, the concept of distinguishing between active and non-active elements design is proposed, which can be widely used for improving the function and artistry of structures directly, especially for a one whose accurate size is not given. Furthermore, user-friendly software packages are developed to enhance its accessibility for practicing engineers and architects. And to reduce the time cost for large timeconsuming complex structure optimization, parallel computing is built-in in the MATLAB codes. The program is easy to use for engineers who may not be familiar with either FEA or structure optimization. And developers can make a deep research on the algorithm by changing the MATLAB codes. Several classical examples are given to show that the improved BESO method is superior for its handy and utility computer program software. To compensate for the imperfection of traditional bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization, material interpolation scheme and sensitivity filter functions are introduced. A suitable filter can overcome the checkerboard and mesh-dependency. And the historical information on accurate elemental sensitivity numbers are used to keep the objective function converging steadily. Apart from rational intervals of the relevant important parameters, the concept of distinguishing between active and non-active elements design is proposed, which can be widely used for improving the function and artistry of structures directly, especially for a one whose accurate size is not given. Furthermore, user-friendly software packages are developed to enhance its accessibility for practicing engineers and architects. And to reduce the time cost for large timeconsuming complex structure optimization, parallel computing is built-in in the MATLAB codes. The program is easy to use for engineers who may not be familiar with either FEA or structure optimization. And developers can make a deep research on the algorithm by changing the MATLAB codes. Several classical examples are given to show that the improved BESO method is superior for its handy and utility computer program software.
出处 《Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica》 SCIE EI CSCD 2015年第4期431-440,共10页 固体力学学报(英文版)
基金 supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.51078311)
关键词 bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization (BESO) continuum structurescomputer program development improved algorithm directed structure topology optimizationportion construction design bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization (BESO), continuum structurescomputer program development, improved algorithm, directed structure topology optimizationportion construction design
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Bendsoe,M.P. and Sigmund,O., Topology Optimization: Theory, Methods and Applications. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg Book Company, 2003.
  • 2Rietz, A., Sufficiency of a finite exponent in SIMP (power law) methods. Structure Multidiscipline Opti- mization, 2001, 21(2): 159-163.
  • 3Xie,Y.M. and Steven,G.P., Evolutionary Structural Optimization. Springer, London Book Company, 1997.
  • 4Querin,O.M., Young,V., Steven,G.P. and Xie,Y.M., Computational efficiency and validation of bi- directional evolutionary structural optimisation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2000, 189(2): 559-573.
  • 5Huang,X. and Xie,Y.M., Bi-directional evolutionary topology optimization of continuum structures with one or multiple materials. Computational Mechanics, 2009, 43(3): 393-401.
  • 6Li,Q., Steven,G.P. and Xie,Y.M., A simple checkerboard suppression algorithm for evolutionary structural optimization. Structure Multidiscipline Optimization, 2001, 22(3): 230-239.
  • 7Huang,X. and Xie,Y.M. Convergent and mesh-independent solutions for bi-directional evolutionary struc- tural optimization method. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2007, 43(14): 1039-1049.
  • 8Zhou,M. and Rozvany, G.I.N. On the validity of ESO type methods in topology optimization. Structure Multidiscipline Optimization, 2001, 21(1): 80-83.
  • 9Edwards,C.S., KimH.A. and Budd,C.J., An evaluative study on ESO and SIMP for optimising a cantilever tie-beam. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2007, 34(5): 403-414.
  • 10Liu,X., Yi,W.J., Li,Q.S. and Shen,P.S., Genetic evolutionary structural optimization. Journal of Construc- tional Steel Research, 2008, 64(3): 305-311.

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部