期刊文献+

国际直接投资法的重构:历史、现状及出路 被引量:1

Reframing the International Direct Investment Law:Its History,Status Quo and Outlet
下载PDF
导出
摘要 二战前外国直接投资法的显著特征是对资方和社会利益攸关者之法律保护失衡,以新古典经济学理论为支撑的现代国际直接投资法保留了二战前的特征。全球领导的缺位阻碍了国际直接投资法综合性多边框架的发展,并导致了国际直接投资法的碎片化。包括联合国、OECD以及非政府组织和私营部门在内的国际社会,规范跨国企业的经验为多边国际直接投资法的构建提供了可资借鉴的宝贵资源。2008年席卷全球并影响至今的金融危机为国际直接投资法的重构创造了机遇。企业社会责任和问责运动、全球企业公民身份的勃兴为国际直接投资法的重构提供了理论框架。 The primary character of foreign direct investment law before the Second World War is the imbalance of legal protection between foreign investors and local stakeholders. Modern international direct investment law based on new classical economics theory retains vestiges of that era. A lack of global leadership impeded the development of a comprehensive multilateral framework of foreign direct investment law and fragmentized it.The efforts of regulating transnational corporations in international society provide the precious reference resources for reframing international direct investment law. The financial crisis of 2008 sweeping all over the world and upto now presents opportunities for reforming international direct investment law. Corporate Social Responsibility & Accountability Movements and the emergence of Global Corporate Citizenship offer a useful theoretical framework for the international investment law reform.
作者 侯洪涛
出处 《河南财经政法大学学报》 2015年第5期143-152,共10页 Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
关键词 国际直接投资法 碎片化 全球企业公民身份 重构 International direct investment law fragmentation Global corporate citizenship reframing
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1https ://www. wto. org/english/thewto_e/thewto_e, htm. 2015 -5 - 1.
  • 2Andrew T. Guzman, Why LDCs Sign Treaties That Hurt Them:Explaining the Popularity of Bilateral nvest- ment Treaties[J]. VA. J. INT'L L,1998, (38):639,640.
  • 3Rachel Anderson et al. The Caribbean and the Banana Trade [ A ]. in Timothy E. Josling & Timothy G. Tay- lor ( ed), Banana Wars : The Anatomy of A Trade Dispute [ C ]. CABI,2002.
  • 4Antony Anghie, Imperialism. Sovereignty and the Making of International Law [ M ]. Cambridge University Press,2004 : 68.
  • 5Andrew Newcombe & Lluis Paradell. Law and Practice of Investment Treaties:Standards of Treatment [ M ]. Kluwer Law International,2009:12 -14.
  • 6Andrew T. Guzman, Why LDCs Sign Treaties That Hurt Them:Explaining the Popularity of Bilateral nvest- ment Treaties[J]. 38 VA. J. INT' L L,1998, (38) :648.
  • 7UNCTAD, Bilateral Investment Treaties, 1959 - 1999, iii, U. N. Doc. UNCTAD/ITE/IIA/2 ( Dec. 2000), availableat http ://www. unctad, org/en/docs/poiteiiad2, en. pdf. 2013 - 9 - 22.
  • 8William S. Dodge, Investor - State Dispute Settlement Between Developed Countries : Reflections on the ustralia- United States Free Trade Agreement[ J]. VAND J TRANSNAT' L L,2006, (39) :14,13 -14.
  • 9OECD, OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises[ Z]. OECD Publishing ,2011. http ://dx. doi. org/ 10. 1787/9789264115415 - en 2013 - 9 - 23.
  • 10U. N. Draft International Code of Conduct on Transnational Corporations, U. N. Doc. E/C. 10/1984/S/5 ( May 29,1984).

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部