期刊文献+

开放数据视域下的国外被遗忘权法律规制发展动向研究 被引量:23

Study on the Development Trends of Legal Regulation Abroad of the Right to Be Forgotten under the Perspective of Open Data
下载PDF
导出
摘要 伴随着开放数据运动中个人信息保护所面临的巨大挑战,2012年,欧盟在个人数据保护立法草案中正式提出"被遗忘权"的概念,试图有针对性地加强网络环境下的个人信息自决权,主张民众有权要求相关机构删除与个人有关的信息。本文阐述了在开放数据视角下被遗忘权的概念及随之演化出的数字化特征,着重介绍了欧盟、美国等国家的立法状况,并探讨了相关国家的责任实施及搜索引擎公司对该项权利的落实与实践操作,继而提出在我国本土化构建的过程中应当合理界定被遗忘权的概念及法律属性,以在开放数据运动中对个人信息予以保护,并加快我国个人信息保护立法进程。 The protection of personal information faces tremendous challenges alongside of the open data movement. In 2012, the EU formally proposed the concept of "the right to be forgotten" in the draft legislation on personal data protection, attempting to strengthen the right to self-determination of personal information under the network environment, argued that people have the right to require the relevant authorities to erasure their personal data. This paper describes the concept of the right to be forgotten and the evolution of right digital features under open data perspective, focusing on the introduction of the legislation of EU, United States and other countries, and discussing the implement of related national responsibility and the search engine company on implementation and practice operation. Moreover, the paper puts forward that we should reasona- bly define the concept and legal attributes of the right to be forgotten in China, to protect personal information under the envi- ronment of open data movement, and to accelerate the legislation of Chinese personal information protection.
出处 《图书情报知识》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第5期121-128,共8页 Documentation,Information & Knowledge
基金 国家社科基金重点项目"数据开放与数据安全的政策协同研究"(15ATQ008) 黑龙江大学研究生创新科研项目"国外被遗忘权立法进程分析与评价"(YJSCX2015-064HLJU)系列研究成果之一
关键词 被遗忘权 删除权 开放数据 个人信息保护 法律规制 Right to be forgotten Right to erasure Open data Protection of personal information Legal & regulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Angelo M. You Are What Google Says You Are[EB/OL]. [2015-04-25]. http://www, wired, com/business/2009/02/you-are-what-go.
  • 2邵国松.“被遗忘的权利”:个人信息保护的新问题及对策[J].南京社会科学,2013(2):104-109. 被引量:75
  • 3杨立新,韩煦.被遗忘权的中国本土化及法律适用[J].法律适用,2015(2):24-34. 被引量:271
  • 4Walker R K. The Right to Be Forgotten. Hastings Law Journal, 2012,64:257-285.
  • 5Koops B J. Forgetting Footprints,Shunning Shadows= A Critical Analysis of the' Right to be Forgotten'in Big Data Practice. Tilburg Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series, 2011,8 ( 3 ) : 229-256.
  • 6郑文明.个人信息保护与数字遗忘权[J].新闻与传播研究,2014,21(5):25-40. 被引量:26
  • 7郑远民,李志春.被遗忘权的概念分析[J].长春师范大学学报,2015,34(1):30-34. 被引量:28
  • 8[英]维克托·迈耶一肖恩伯格删除-数字时代里遗忘的美德[M].袁杰译,杭州:浙江人民出版社,2013:115-116.
  • 9Gilbert F. The Right of Erasure or Right to be Forgotten : What the Recent Laws, Cases, and Guidelines Mean for Global Companies. Jour- nal of Internet Law, 2015,18(8), 13-20.
  • 10陈飞.等译个人数据保护--欧盟指令及成员国法律、经合组织指导方针[M]北京:法律出版社,2006.

二级参考文献51

  • 1王利明.隐私权的新发展[J].人大法律评论,2009(1):3-27. 被引量:64
  • 2王利明.公众人物人格权的限制和保护[J].中州学刊,2005(2):92-98. 被引量:157
  • 3齐爱民.中华人民共和国个人信息保护法示范法草案学者建议稿[J].河北法学,2005,23(6):2-5. 被引量:184
  • 4王利明等.《人格权法新论》,吉林人民出版社,1994年版,第441-442页.
  • 5Private Data, Public Rules, ECONOMIST (Jan. 28, 2012).
  • 6Eva Arevuo, Should There be a "Right to be Forgotten" on the Internet? (Feb. 15, 2012 ) http.//legallyeasy, rocketlawyer. corn/should - there - be - a - right - to - be - forgotten - on - the - intemet - 94508.
  • 7Google Should Not Have to Delete Data under "Right to Be For- gotten", Company Lawyer Says, OUT - LAW (Feb. 15, 2012).
  • 8Council of Europe, European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, art. 8, ETS 5 ( Sep. 4, 1950).
  • 9Richards, Neil M. & Solove, Daniel J. , Pmsserg Privacy Law. A Mixed Legacy, 98 CAL. L. REV. 1887 (2010).
  • 10【美】理查德·c.托克音顿,阿丽塔·L艾伦.《美国隐私法》,冯建妹等译,中国民主法制出版社2004年版,第363页.

共引文献344

同被引文献284

引证文献23

二级引证文献161

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部