教练员-运动员依恋关系量表的跨文化检验与修订

Chinese Version of Coach-athlete Attachment Scale

目的：对教练员-运动员依恋关系量表进行跨文化的检验与修订,为评价中国教练员-运动员依恋风格提供合适的测量工具。方法：以367名运动员和232名教练员为测试对象,采用探索性因素分析、内部一致性检验和验证性因素分析等方法对教练员-运动员依恋风格量表（中文版）进行检验和修订。结果：探索性因素分析发现,教练员-运动员依恋风格（中文版）由回避、焦虑和安全三个维度构成;三个维度的内部一致性信度系数在0.826~0.96之间,分半信度在0.807~0.941之间;验证性因素分析表明,修订后教练员-运动员依恋关系量表（中文版）的三维结构拟合良好（运动员依恋量表：RMSEA=0.048,GFI=0.915,CFI=0.976）;教练员依恋量表：RMSEA=0.076,GFI=0.905,CFI=0.933）。结论：修订后教练员-运动员依恋关系量表（中文版）具有良好的信效度,可以用来测量中国教练员-运动员群体的依恋风格。

Objective The purpose of this study was to determine the psychometric properties of the revised Coach-athlete Attachment Scale（CAAS） for assessing attachment styles of coaches and athletes in China.Method 367 athletes and 232 coaches were examined and administered by the CAAS. Exploratory factor analysis,Internal consistency reliability,and Confirmatory factor analysis were used to reduce the item number in CAAS,and to assess and confirm the content and the structure of CAAS（Chinese version）. Results The CAAS（Chinese version） was constructed with three distinct factors： avoidance,anxiety,and security. Its Cronbach α coefficients of the three dimensions ranged from 0.826 to 0.96,and split-half reliability coefficients from 0.807 to 0.941. The construct validity of 3-dimentional CAAS（Chinese version） included RMSEA = 0.048,GFI = 0.915,CFI = 0.976 for athlete attachment scale and RMSEA = 0.076,GFI = 0.905,CFI = 0.933 for coach attachment scale. Conclusion Coach-Athlete Attachment Scale（Chinese version） shows good reliability and validity for measuring Chinese coaches and athlete＇s attachment styles.