期刊文献+

万古霉素治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌肺炎老年患者的疗效分析 被引量:16

Efficacy of vancomycin in treatment of pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the elderly patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨万古霉素治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(M RS A )肺炎老年患者的疗效和安全性。方法回顾性分析M RS A肺炎老年患者40例,根据治疗方案,将患者分为2组:万古霉素组25例,给予万古霉素每次0.5 g ,每8小时1次,静脉滴注,治疗时间10~14 d;利奈唑胺组15例,给予利奈唑胺每次0.6 g ,每12小时1次,静脉滴注,治疗时间10~14 d。比较两组患者的疗效和不良反应。结果万古霉素组临床有效率为72.0%,利奈唑胺组为86.7%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);经治疗后,万古霉素组MRSA清除率为76.0%,利奈唑胺组为80.0%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);利奈唑胺组有3例发生血小板减少>25%,占20.0%,万古霉素组未见血小板减少,万古霉素组有4例发生急性肾功能不全,占16.0%,利奈唑胺组未见肾功能损害。结论万古霉素治疗老年M RS A肺炎有较好的临床疗效,血小板减少的发生率低,应警惕急性肾功能不全的风险。 Objective To examine the efficacy and safety profile of vancomycin in treatment of pneumonia caused by methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)in the elderly patients .Methods The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed for 40 elderly patients with MRSA‐induced pneumonia .The patients were analyzed in terms of treatment regimen ,vancomycin (n=25)or linezolid (n= 15) .Vancomycin was administered intravenously at dose of 0 .5 g every 8 hours for 10‐14 days ,while linezolid was given intravenously at dose of 0 .6 g every 12 hours for 10‐14 days .The clinical efficacy and adverse events were compared between the two groups .Results The overall efficacy rate was 72 .0% in vancomycin group ,and 86 .7% in linezolid group (P>0 .05) .After treatment ,the clearance rate of MRSA was 76 .0% in vancomycin group ,and 80 .0% in linezolid group (P>0 .05) .Reduction of platelet counts by more than 25% was found in 3 (20 .0% )patients treated with linezolid ,but none patient in vancomycin group .Acute renal dysfunction was reported in 4 (16 .0% )patients in vancomycin group but not identified in linezolid group .Conclusions Vancomycin has positive effect in the treatment of MRSA pneumonia in the elderly . Vancomycin treatment is associated with lower risk of thrombocytopenia ,but relatively higher risk of acute renal dysfunction .
出处 《中国感染与化疗杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期434-438,共5页 Chinese Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
关键词 万古霉素 利奈唑胺 耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌 肺炎 老年 vancomycin linezolid methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia,elderly
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Rubinstein E, Kollef MH, Nathwani D. Pneumonia caused by methlcillin-resistant Staphylococcusaureus[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2008,46(Suppl 5) :s378-s385.
  • 2胡付品,朱德妹,汪复,蒋晓飞,杨青,徐英春,张小江,孙自镛,陈中举,王传清,王爱敏,倪语星,孙景勇,俞云松,林洁,单斌,杜艳,徐元宏,沈继录,张泓,孔菁,卓超,苏丹虹,张朝霞,季萍,胡云建,艾效曼,黄文祥,贾蓓,魏莲花,吴玲.2011年中国CHINET细菌耐药性监测[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2012,12(5):321-329. 被引量:526
  • 3American Thoracic Society; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, ventilator-associated, and healthcare- associated pneumonia[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2005, 171(4) :388-416.
  • 4Pletz MW, Burkhardt O, Weite T. Nosocomial methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pneumonia: linezolid or vancomycin? Comparison of pharmacology and clinical efficacy[J]. Eur J Med Res, 2010, 15(12) :507-513.
  • 5Rybak MJ, Lomaestro BM, Rotschafer JC, et al. Vancomycin therapeutic guidelines: a summary of consensus recommendations from the infectious diseases society ofAmerica, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2009, 49(3): 325 -327.
  • 6Caffrey AR, Quilliam BJ, LaPlante KL. Comparative efectiveness of linezolid and vancomycin among a national cohort of patients infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusEJT. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2010,54(10) : 4394-4400.
  • 7林东昉,吴菊芳,张婴元,郑经川,缪竞智,郑丽叶,盛瑞媛,周新,沈华浩,吴卫红,周乐,汪复.利奈唑胺与万古霉素治疗革兰阳性菌感染的随机、双盲、对照、多中心临床试验[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2009,9(1):10-17. 被引量:56
  • 8Kalil AC,Murthy MH, Hermsen ED, et al. Linezolid versus vaneomycin or teicoplanin for nosocomial pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Crit Care Med, 2010, 38(9) : 1802-1808.
  • 9Walkey A J, O' Donnell MR, Wiener RS. Linezolid vs glycopeptide antibiotics for the treatment of suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J]. Chest,2011,139(5):1148-1155.
  • 10Wunderink RG,Niederman MS, Kollef MH, el al. Linezolid in methieillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial pneumonia:a randomized, controlled study[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2012, 54(5):621-629.

二级参考文献45

  • 1朱德妹,汪复,张婴元.2005年上海地区细菌耐药性监测[J].中国感染与化疗杂志,2006,6(6):371-376. 被引量:82
  • 2Nasraway SA,Shorr AF,Kuter DJ,et al.Linezolid does not increase the risk of thrombocytopenia in patients with nosocomial pneumonia:comparative analysis of linezolid and vancomycin use[J].Clin Infect Dis,2003,37:1609-1616.
  • 3Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).Staphylococcus aureus resistant to vancomycin-United States[J].MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep,2002,51:565-567.
  • 4Falagas ME,Siempos Ⅱ,Vardakas KZ.Linezolid versus glycopeptide or bata-lactam for treatment of Gram-positive bacterial infections:meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials[J].Lancet Infect Dis,2008,8:53-66.
  • 5Vardakas KZ,Kioumis Ⅰ,Falagas ME.Association of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic aspects of linezolid with infection outcome[J].Curr Drug Metab,2009,10:2-12.
  • 6Garazzino S,De Rosa FG,Bargiacchi O,et al.Haematological safety of long-term therapy with linezolid[J].Int J Antimicrob Agents,2007,29:480-483.
  • 7Bernstein WB,Trotta RF,Rector JT,et al.Mechanisms for linezolid-induced anemia and thrombocytopenia[J].Ann Pharmacother,2003,37:517-520.
  • 8Zabransky RJ.Linezolid:the first of a new class of antimicrobial agents[J].Clin Microb Newslett,2002,24(4):25-30.
  • 9Gerson SL,Kaplan SL,Bruss JB,et al.Hematologic effects of linezolid:summary of clinical experience[J].Antimicrob Agents Chemother,2002,46(8):2723-2726.
  • 10Nasraway SA,Shorr AF,Kuter D J,et al.Linezolid does not increase the risk of thromboeytopenia in patients with nosocomial pneumonia:comparative analysis of linezolid and vancomycin use[J].Clin Infect Dis,2003,37(12):1609-1616.

共引文献674

同被引文献111

引证文献16

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部