行政诉讼“原告就被告”地域管辖规则之缺陷及其完善

The Drawbacks and Perfection of Administrative Jurisdiction Rules On Plaintiff Accommodated to Defendant

管辖制度是行政诉讼的重要制度,不仅关系到行政相对人合法权益的实现程度,也影响着司法公正和司法权威。新《行政诉讼法》关于管辖制度的修改是行政诉讼的进步,却仍然无力触及行政诉讼一般地域管辖中"原告就被告"原则,忽视行政诉讼作为私权对公权的对抗特殊性,不利于原告诉权保护,加剧了司法地方化。为实现行政诉讼目的,保障行政相对人合法权益,应赋予原告管辖选择权,原、被告同一辖区可择地而诉,确保正义分配。

Jurisdiction is an important institution of administrative litigation. It relates to not only the implementation of the administrative relative person legitimate rights and interests, but also the justice and judicial authority. The modifying about juristiction in the new 'Administrative Procedure Law' is of a great progress of administrative litigation, but still unable to shake the general territorial jurisdiction 'plaintiff accommodated to defendant' principle, ignoring administrative litigation as private rights against public power. The plaintiff is not conducive to the protection of the right to appeal, exacerbated by judicial localization. To achieve the purpose of the administrative proceedings and protect the legitimate rights and interests of the administrative counterpart, this paper gives the plaintiff the right to choose the jurisdiction, to ensure that justice assignment.