摘要
目的:比较即刻种植法与传统延期种植法在修复牙齿缺失时的临床效果。方法选择2011年12月~2012年9月在我院因牙齿缺失进行牙齿种植的患者90例,分为即刻种植组和延期种植组,每组45例,比较两组的近期疗效和远期疗效。结果通过两组1、3、6个月的种植体稳定性(ISQ 值)的对比发现,两组的 ISQ 值差异无统计学意义(P 〉 0.05)。经过两年的随访发现,两组在牙齿松动、牙周组织红肿及溢脓情况方面差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。结论即刻种植能实现跟传统延期种植相近的临床疗效,而且可以大幅度减少治疗时间以及给患者带来的不便和心理压力。
Objective To compare the clinical effects of immediate implantation and delayed implantation on re-pairing tooth loss. Methods 90 patients with tooth loss from Dec. 2011 to Jun. 2012 in our hospital were assigned to immediate implantation group and delayed implantation group with 45 patients in each group. The short - term and long - term clinical effects were compared. Results There was no significant difference in implant stability quotient (ISQ)after 1,3,6 month between the two groups(P 〉 0. 05). There was no significant difference in gomphiasis,perio-dontal tissue inflammation and pyorrhea after two years between the two groups(P 〉 0. 05). Conclusion Immediate implantation has the similar clinical effects as delayed implantation. It can largely reduce the curative time and incon-venience as well as psychological stress brought to patients.
出处
《医学新知》
CAS
2015年第4期262-264,共3页
New Medicine
关键词
牙齿缺失
即刻种植
延期种植
Tooth loss
Immediate implantation
Delayed implantation