期刊文献+

七氟醚与异氟醚低流量吸入麻醉临床应用对比分析 被引量:5

Comparative Clinical Applications of Low-flow Analysis Sevoflurane and Isoflurane in Inhalation Anesthesia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 分析并对比七氟醚与异氟醚低流量吸入麻醉的临床效果。方法 于2014年3月-2015年2月在我院行手术治疗时需全身麻醉和气管插管的患者中随机抽取70例为本次观察对象,平均分成对照组与观察组,每组各35例。对照组给予患者异氟醚麻醉,观察组给予患者七氟醚麻醉,对两组临床表现进行记录分析。结果 与对照组相比,观察组患者拔管时间、苏醒时间及Aldrete评分时间均低,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);对照组与观察组患者的治疗满意度分别为68.6%、94.3%,组间差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论 相对比异氟醚而言,七氟醚的麻醉临床效果更显著,且安全性高,有助于提高患者满意度。 Objective To analyze and compare the clinical effects of low-flow inhalation sevoflurane and isoflurane anesthesia. Methods In March 2014 to February 2015 in our hospital underwent surgery patients require general anesthesia and tracheal intubation were randomly selected 70 cases observed object-oriented times,were divided into a control group and the observation group,each 35 cases. The control group received isoflurane anesthesia in patients in the observation group sevoflurane anesthesia administered to the patient,the clinical manifestations were recorded for both groups analyzed. Results Compared with the control group,the observation group were extubation time,recovery time and time aldrete scores were significantly lower,the difference was statistical y significant(P〈 0.05),the control group and the observation group of patients with treatment satisfaction were 68.6 %,94.3% difference between the groups was statistical y significant(P〈 0.05). Conclusion In terms of the relative ratio of isoflurane, sevoflurane anesthesia clinical effect is more pronounced,and safe,to help improve patient satisfaction.
作者 刘彦锋
出处 《中国卫生标准管理》 2015年第25期190-191,共2页 China Health Standard Management
关键词 七氟醚 异氟醚 麻醉 临床效果 Sevoflurane Isoflurane Anesthesia Clinical effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献33

  • 1刘伯飞,王英伟.喉罩和气管导管通气的七氟醚最低浓度分析[J].中国基层医药,2006,13(10):1672-1672. 被引量:10
  • 2赵杰.丙泊酚复合瑞芬太尼与静吸复合麻醉用于腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床观察[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2007,12(2):172-173. 被引量:20
  • 3Veyckemans F. Excitation phenomena during sevoflurane anaesthesia in children[J]. Curr Opin AnaesthesM,2001,14 ( 3 ) : 339-343.
  • 4Sahin S H,Cinar S O,Paksoy I,et al.Comparison betweenlow flow sevoflurane anesthesia and total intravenous anesthe-sia during intermediate-duration surgery:effects on renal andhepatic toxicity[J].Hippokratia,2011,15(1):69.
  • 5Modesti C,Sacco T,Morelli G,et al.Balanced anestesia ver-sus total intravenous anestesia for kidney transplantation[J].Minerva anestesiologica,2006,72(7-8):627.
  • 6Ryu H G,Lee J H,Lee K K,et al.The effect of low freshgas flow rate on sevoflurane consumption[J].Korean J Anes-thesiol,2011,60(2):75.
  • 7Muellejans B,Lopez A,Cross M H,et al.Remifentanil ver-sus fentanyl for analgesia based sedation to provide patientcomfort in the intensive care unit:a randomized,double-blind controlled trial[J].Crit Care,2004,8(1):R1.
  • 8Marini F,Bellugi I,Gambi D,et al.Compound A,formalde-hyde and methanol concentrations during low-flow sevoflu-rane anaesthesia:comparison of three carbon dioxide absorbers[J].Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica,2007,51(5):625.
  • 9Obata R,Bito H,Ohmura M,et al.The effects of prolongedlow-flow sevoflurane anesthesia on renal and hepatic function[J].Anesthesia and analgesia,2000,91(5):1262.
  • 10刘晓绛,黄健承,罗希,董庆龙,叶靖.两种麻醉方法对腹腔镜胆囊切除术后患者呼吸循环和意识恢复的比较[J].广州医学院学报,2007,35(2):43-45. 被引量:2

共引文献69

同被引文献37

引证文献5

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部