摘要
①目的比较碘伏与84消毒液对早产儿暖箱箱体内壁、贮水口、操作窗、箱体内空气的消毒效果。②方法在病室环境相同条件下进行,随机将暖箱分为观察组和对照组。观察组用250mg/L碘伏消毒液箱体表面、操作窗和贮水口;对照组用84消毒液,消毒相同的部位,室内空气消毒两组方法相同。每次消毒先后对物体表面和空气采样,进行细菌培养。比较两组消毒剂消毒效果。③结果碘伏消毒液消毒后细菌总数两组比较差异有显著性(P<0.05);暖箱内空气消毒后细菌总数两组比较差异有显著性(P<0.05)。④结论 250mg/L碘伏溶液用于暖箱消毒,消毒效果优于84消毒液。
Objective Comparison of two different disinfectant on the surface of a preterm infant incubator and the influence of the air colony count.Methods Under the same environment,Incubator were randomly divided into experimental group and control group,The experimental group.250mg/L iodine volts detergent wipe the surface of the casing, Operation window, shuikou storage; Control group.250mg/L "250" chlorine disinfectant,With the experimental group.Compare two groups disinfectant effect.Results Two kinds of disinfectant effect comparison before and after disinfection( P 〈0.05) ;Two kinds of disinfectant after disinfection effect comparison( P 〈0.05).Conclusion 250mg/L iodine v solution used for disinfection of warm box,sterilization effect is good.
出处
《河北联合大学学报(医学版)》
2015年第5期104-105,共2页
Journal of North China Coal Medical College
基金
唐山市科技局临床医学研究计划资助项目(编号:11150205A-14)
关键词
暖箱
碘伏消毒液
84消毒液
消毒
Warm bos;Lodophor disinfection solution;84 diszhfeclton;Disinfect