制度变迁中的宅基地财产权兴起——对当前若干制度创新的评析

Institutional Change in the Homestead Property Rise:Research of Agricultural Land Reform and Collective Realization-Commentary on the Current Number of Institutional Innovation

在长期实践中,我国农村宅基地方面已经形成一套相对完善的制度体系,实现地利共享、保护耕地与地尽其利三方面目标。围绕制度改革问题,学界与政策界的宅基地财产权话语分别指向宅基地制度的不同层面,形成多重话语混乱局面。不同语境下宅基地财产权话语的内涵不同,当前一些制度创新观点与做法围绕财产权不同所指展开,致使当前流行的"同地同权"观点、"增减挂钩"政策等存在问题。当前宅基地制度改革主要针对的是城镇化进程中的人地关系矛盾与宅基地退出问题,对此需要探索从实践出发的操作办法。

In the long-term practice,system of systems, to achieve geographicalChina＇s rural homestead has formed a relatively completesharing, protection of arable land and to make its profits inthree goals. Academia and the rise of the homestead property policy discourse, when discussing the issueof reform and innovation point to different levels homestead system, the formation of muhipled is coursechaos. Homestead property policies in different contexts have different meanings. In reality, some of theinstitution alinnovative ideas and practices conflict with the existing system, leading to the popular ＂withthe right to the same＂ view ＂Increase and decrease change link＂ problem policy. The current homesteadsystem reform aimed primarily at urban background to the relationship between servant-land and HousingWithdrawal contradiction, which need to be explored methods of operation starting from practice.