摘要
目的比较单纯掌侧或背侧钢板治疗桡骨远端关节内骨折的疗效,推荐最佳的手术方式。方法回顾性分析42例桡骨远端关节内骨折手术治疗的患者,均为闭合性骨折。15例采用背侧钢板(背侧组),男5例,女10例;年龄48~62[(55±7)岁]。致伤原因:摔伤13例,交通伤2例。AO分类为C3型10例,C2型5例。27例采用掌侧钢板(掌侧组),男8例,女19例;年龄50—62岁[(56±6)岁]。致伤原因:摔伤24例,交通伤3例。AO分类为C3型17例,C2型10例。比较两组术后腕部的活动范围、影像学参数、并发症、臂肩手功能(DASH)评分以及Gartland—Werley评分。结果42例患者均获得11~25个月的随访,两组腕部活动范围以及影像学参数的差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。Gartland—Werley评分掌侧组明显低于背侧组[1分:4分,P〈0.05],而两组DASH评分差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。背侧组4例(27%)发生肌腱粘连,需行肌腱松解术;掌侧组1例(4%)发生正中神经症状(P〈0.05)。结论尽管两种治疗方法DASH评分相近,掌侧钢板Gartland—Werley评分及并发症发生率要优于背侧钢板。因此,掌侧钢板是治疗桡骨远端关节内骨折较好的方法。
Objective To compare the clinical effect of simple volar or dorsal plate fixation of intra-articular distal radius fracture. Methods This retrospective study included 42 patients with closed intra-articular distal radius fracture treated surgically using the dorsal or volar plate. Out of the 15 patients in dorsal plating group 5 were males and 10 females at age of (55 ± 7 )years (range, 48- 62 years) , 13 were injured from falls and 2 traffic accidents, 10 were classified as AO type C3 and 5 AO type C2. Out of the 27 patients in volar plating group 8 were males and 19 females at age of (56 ± 6)years (range, 50-62 years) , 24 were injured from falls and 3 traffic accidents, 17 were classified as AO type C3 and 10 AO type C2. Between-group differences were compared with respect to wrist range of motion, postoperative radiographic parameters, postoperative complications, disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score and Gartland-Werley score. Results All the patients were followed up for 11-25 months. There were no significant differences in the wrist range of motion and radiographic parameters between the two groups ( P 〉 0.05 ). Volar plating group resulted in a significantly better Gartland-Werley score compared to dorsal plating group [ 1 vs 4 points, P 〈 0.05 ] , but no significant difference was noted in DASH score (P 〉 0. 05). Four patients (27%) in dorsal plating group developed tendon adhesions and tenolysis was in demand, but one patients (4%) in volar plating group was complicated by median nerve symptoms (P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusions Although the DASH score of the two methods was similar, volar plating yields better results in Gartland-Werley score and complication incidence. Thus the volar plating is recommended for intra-articular distal radius fracture.
出处
《中华创伤杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2015年第10期937-940,共4页
Chinese Journal of Trauma
关键词
桡骨骨折
骨折固定术
内
掌侧钢板
Radius fractures
Fracture fixation, internal
Volar plates