摘要
文明起源理论,在马克思主义视域也指国家起源的理论。20世纪80年代初,美籍华人历史学、考古学家张光直提出的"连续与破裂"的"文明起源新说"传入国内后,引发我国学界对摩尔根—马克思文明起源理论的反思和检讨,由此出现了种种中国人"误读"摩尔根、马克思之说。究竟中国学界是否存在这种"误读"?文本分析显示:第一,不存在中国人"误读";第二,存在对摩尔根理论的"过度诠释"。作此诠释者是恩格斯。
In the vision of Marxism, the origin of civilization theory also refers to the origin of national theory. In the early 1980s, American. historians, archaeologists, ZHANG Guangzhi＇s new theory of ＂the origin of civiliza- tion＂ was introduced into China, and caused reflection and review on Morgan-Marx＇s origin of civilization theory in academic circles of our country, thus the Chinese misunderstood Morgan-Marx＇s views appeared. Is there a kind of ＂misunderstanding＂ in China academic circles？ Text analysis shows that： first, there is no Chinese ＂ misunderstanding＂ ; Second, there is an excessive interpretation of Morgan＇s theory, and the interpreter is En- gels.
出处
《燕山大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2015年第3期29-38,共10页
Journal of Yanshan University:Philosophy and Social Science
关键词
文明起源理论
文本分析
误读
过度诠释
the Origin of civilization theory
text analysis
misunderstanding
excessive interpretation
