期刊文献+

早期乳腺癌施行单纯乳房切除加前哨淋巴结活检术临床疗效对比研究 被引量:9

Clinical effect of simple mastectomy combined with sentinel lymph nodes biopsy in early breast cancer: a comparative study
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究早期乳腺癌在单纯乳房切除加前哨淋巴结冰冻活检阴性基础上,不再施行腋窝淋巴结清扫术,评估术后早期患侧上肢功能及远期生存状况,分析单纯前哨淋巴结活检术的安全性与可行性。方法对TNM分期在T1-2N0M0早期乳腺癌患者,施行单纯乳腺切除术,术中前哨淋巴结快速冰冻活检均为阴性转移者45例,随机分为两组,治疗组(23例)为仅前哨淋巴结活检,对照组(22例)为继续腋窝淋巴结(I-II水平)清扫术,两组术后均行同法放化疗,比较分析两组患者的患侧上肢功能状况及远期生存差异。结果比较术后1、2、4周患者患侧上臂周径:治疗组3次与术前差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);对照组1、2周时上臂周径明显长于术前(P<0.05),4周时差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。肩关节功能Neer评分比较:治疗组术后1、2周得分与术前比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),4周时得分与术前相当(P>0.05);对照组术后术前比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),且术后4周治疗组在Neer得分与肩关节外展角度评估上均优于对照组(P<0.05)。术后随访半年:治疗组无患侧上肢淋巴水肿,对照组出现上肢淋巴水肿5例,差异显著(P<0.05);治疗组的Neer得分与肩关节外展角度与术前比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但对照组均小于术前,差异有统计意义(P<0.05),且术后半年,治疗组的Neer得分与肩关节外展角度优于对照组;两组均未发生肿瘤复发、转移及腋窝淋巴结肿大。结论早期乳腺癌且前哨淋巴结快速冰冻活检阴性转移者,施行单纯乳房切除加前哨淋巴结活检术,在术后评估肩关节功能Neer评分、肩关节外展角度及患侧上肢淋巴水肿发生上,明显优于外加腋窝淋巴结清扫术,且远期的复发、转移、生存状况二者差异无统计学意义,其安全性、可行性得到验证,临床继续随访,可更加清晰的评估其安全性。 Objective: To evaluate the affected side upper limb function and long-term survival of early breast cancer patients trea- ted by simple mastectomy based on negative result of sentinel lymph nodes biopsy without axillary lymph node dissection, analyze the safety and feasibility of simple sentinel lymph nodes biopsy. Methods : The early breast cancer patients of TNM stage T1-2N0M0 underwent sim- ple mastectomy, 45 patients were found with negative result of fast frozen biopsy of sentinel lymph nodes during operation, then they were randomly divided into two groups, 23 patients in treatment group received only sentinel lymph nodes biopsy, while 22 patients in control group received axillary lymph node dissection at the level of Ⅰ - Ⅱ ; after operation, the patients in the two groups were treated with chemora- diotherapy using the same method; the affected side upper limb function and long-term survival in the two groups were compared and ana- lyzed. Results: Comparison of affected side upper limb circumferences after one, two, and four weeks of treatment: there was no statistically significant difference between before and after treatment in treatment group (P〉0. 05) ; in control group, affected side upper limb circumfer- ences after one and two weeks were statistically significantly longer than those before treatment ( P〈0.05 ), but there was no statistically sig- nificant difference between after four weeks of treatment and before treatment (P〉0. 05 ) . Comparison of Neer score of shoulder function: there were statistically significant differences in Neer scores of shoulder function between after one and two weeks of treatment and before treatment in treatment group (P〈0. 05 ), there was no statistically significant difference in Neer score of shoulder function between after four weeks of treatment and before treatment ( P〉0. 05 ) ; in control group, there were statistically significant differences in Neer scores of shoul- der function between after one, two and four weeks of treatment and before treatment ( P〈0. 05 ), Neer score of shoulder function and shoul- der abduction angle after four weeks of treatment in treatment group were statistically significantly better than those in control group (P〈0. 05 ) . Postoperative follow-up: no affected side upper limb edema occurred in treatment group, five patients with affected side upper limb edema were found in control group, there was statistically significant difference (P〈0. 05 ) ; in treatment group, there was no statistically sig- nificant difference in Neer score of shoulder function and shoulder abduction angle between after one, two, and four weeks of treatment and before treatment, but in control group, Neer score of shoulder function and shoulder abduction angle after one, two, and four weeks of treat- ment were statistically significantly less than those before treatment ; after six months of treatment, Neer score of shoulder function and shoul- der abduction angle in treatment group were better than those in control group; no tumor recurrence, metastasis, and axillary lymphadenecta- sis occurred in the two groups. Conclusion: For the early breast cancer patients with negative result of fast frozen biopsy during operation, simple mastectomy combined with sentinel lymph nodes biopsy were significantly superior to simple mastectomy combined with sentinel lymph nodes biopsy and axillary lymph node dissection in aspects of postoperative evaluation of Neer score of shoulder function, shoulder abduction angle, and occurrence of affected side Upper limb edema; there is no significant difference in long-term recurrence, metastasis, and survival between the two methods, the safety and feasibility are verified, further foUow-up can evaluate the safety more clearly.
机构地区 海南省人民医院
出处 《中国妇幼保健》 CAS 2015年第29期4949-4951,共3页 Maternal and Child Health Care of China
基金 海南省自然科学基金项目〔20158293〕琼卫2013重点-09号
关键词 早期乳腺癌 前哨淋巴结 乳房切除 临床研究 Early breast cancer Sentinel lymph node Mastectomy Clinical research
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1张延龄,吴肇汉.实用外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:455—460.
  • 2王永胜.乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检:共识与展望[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2009,16(7):505-509. 被引量:51
  • 3Goldhirsch A, Ingle JN, Gelber RD, et al. Thresholds for therapies : highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Con- sensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2009 [J]. Ann Oncol, 2009, 20 (8) : 1319-1329.
  • 4Warmuth MA, Bowen G, Prosnitz LR, et al. Complications of axillary lymph node ' dissection for carcinoma of the breast: a report based on a patient survey[J]. Cancer, 1998, 83 (7) : 1362-1368.
  • 5Ashikaga T, Krag DN, Land SR, et al. Morbidity results from the NSABP B-32 trial comparing sentinel lymph node dissec- tion versus axillary dissection [J]. Journal of Surgical Oncol- ogy, 2010, 102 (2): 111-118.
  • 6孙恒,尉承泽.前哨淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者腋窝转移的相关危险因素探究[J].中国妇幼保健,2015,30(6):839-841. 被引量:7
  • 7Jatoi I. Management of the axilla in primary breast cancer[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 1999, 79 (5) : 1061-1073.

二级参考文献27

  • 1Fleissig A,Fallowfield LJ,Langridge CI,et al.Post-operative arm morbidity and quality of life.Results of the ALMANAC randomised trial comparing sentinel node biopsy with standard axillary treatment in the management of patients with early breast cancer[J].Breast Cancer Res Treat,2006; 95(3):279-293.
  • 2Veronesi U,Paganelli G,Viale G,et al.A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer[J].N Engl J Med,2003; 349(6):546-553.
  • 3Julian TB,Krag D,Brown A,et al.Preliminary technical results of NSABP B-32,a randomized phase Ⅲ clinical trial to compare sentinel node resection to conventional axillary dissection in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients[J].Breast Cancer Res Treat,2004; 88(Suppl 1):s11-s12.
  • 4Helyer LK,Coburn NG,Law CH,et al.Axillary staging is more accurate today than ever before:no increase in the false negative rate with wide-spread adoption of sentinel node technique[J].Breast Cancer Res Treat,2007; 106(Suppl 1):s127-s128.
  • 5Filippakis GM,Zografos G.Contraindications of sentinel lymph node biopsy:are there any really?[J].World J Surg Oncol,2007; 5(1):10-20.
  • 6Lyman GH,Giuliano AE,Somerfield MR,et al.American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer[J].J Clin Oncol,2005; 23(30):7703-7720.
  • 7Silverstein MJ,Lagios MD,Recht A,et al.Image-detected breast cancer:state of the art diagnosis and treatment[J].J Am Coll Surg,2005; 201(4):586-597.
  • 8Carlson RW,Anderson BO,Burstein HJ,et al.NCCN breast cancer clinical practice guidelines in oncology.Version 1,2009.Available at:http://www.nccn.org/physician_gls/ PDF/breast.pdf.Accessed January 25,2009.
  • 9Goldhirsch A,Wood WC,Gelber RD,et al.Progress and promise:highlights of the international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2007[J].Ann Oncol,2007; 18(7):1133-1144.
  • 10王永胜 B2.乳腺癌局部区域治疗,进展与共识.中国医学论坛报,2009,35(12).

共引文献57

同被引文献86

引证文献9

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部