《刑法修正案(九)(草案)》(二次审议稿)第36条争议问题研究

On the Controversy of Article36 of the Ninth Criminal Law Amendment( draft)

《刑法修正案(九)》的草案及草案二审稿均对扰乱法庭秩序罪作出了修改,增加了殴打诉讼参与人以及侮辱、诽谤、威胁司法工作人员或者诉讼参与人,不听法庭制止等严重扰乱法庭秩序的情形,降低了入罪门槛。这是在当前司法公正和司法公信力方面存在问题、审辩冲突激烈背景下,适时作出的调整。通过对扰乱法庭秩序罪罪名渊源、修改过程的梳理,认为,为了维护司法权威、构建法律职业共同体,聚众哄闹、冲击法庭,殴打司法工作人员、诉讼参与人的行为,仍应达到严重扰乱法庭秩序的程度,方可入罪;应当将侮辱、诽谤、威胁司法工作人员或者诉讼参与人,不听法庭制止,严重扰乱法庭秩序的行为纳入扰乱法庭秩序罪的行为方式中,但同时,也必须在立法中明确"公然侮辱""恶意诽谤"和"以暴力相威胁"的标准;"其他扰乱法庭秩序行为"这一兜底性条款应当删除。

The Ninth Criminal Law Amendment （draft） reduces the threshold into sin by punishing such behavior which seriously disturbs the order of the court as beating participants and insulting, slandering, threating to the judicial officers or participants in the proceedings. Howevert, through the breach of the order of the court on charges of origin, the modification process of comb, at the same time, in order to safeguard judicial authority and build legal professional community, only such behavior reach the level of seriously dis- turbing the order of the court shall it be the punished as a crime. At the same time, the standards also must be clear in the legislation in ＂an affront to＂, ＂malicious slander＂ and ＂to the threat of violence＂. The clause of other disrupt the order of the court should be deleted.