畲医发痧疗法与传统刮痧疗法的临床疗效比较

Comparison on Effect of She Medicine and Traditional Methods in Treatment of Sha Syndrome

目的:探讨畲医与传统手法在治疗痧症上的疗效比较。方法:对2012年7月—2014年6月间在医院确诊为痧症的46例患者进行研究,随机抽取23例为对照组,只接受传统手法治疗;另23例作为治疗组,只接受畲医治疗,在1周之后观察疗效,对比两组之间的结果。结果:在对照组中,23例接受传统手法治疗的患者中,患者的有效率为69.6%(治愈10/23,好转6/23,无效7/23);治疗组中,23例接受畲医的发痧治疗的患者有效率为86.9%(治愈13/23,好转7/23,无效3/23)。治疗后,治疗组患者的全身酸痛,腹痛和腹泻的缓解率高于对照组,差异有统计学的意义,血尿酸的变化也有统计学差异。结论:畲医在治疗痧症方面的疗效较传统手法显著。

Objective ： To compare the effect of She medicine and traditional methods in the treatment of Sha syndrome. Methods ：46 patients with Sha syndrome were divided into two grouPs：treatment group and control group. Treatment group were treated with She medicine. The control group was given only traditional methods. The course was one week. The effects of the two groups were compared before and after the treatment. Results ： The effect of treatment group was obviously superior to that of the control group （86.9% Vs 69.9% ,P 〈 0.05）. Remission rates of body aches, abdominal pain and diarrhea in the treatment group were higher than those of the control group （P 〈 0.05） after treatment. Changes of serum uric acid also had a significant difference. Conclusion：She medicine in the treatment of Sha syndrome was significantly better than traditional methods.