期刊文献+

异质消费者行为模式下的双渠道供应链系统协调与优化 被引量:15

Dual-Channel Supply Chain Coordination and Optimization with Heterogeneous Consumer Behavior
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以1个制造商和1个零售商组成的二级、双渠道供应链系统为研究对象,研究当目标市场中潜在顾客的购买决策存在包括"有限理性"、渠道忠诚在内的多种行为模式时,供应链系统的最优定价策略。为了研究复杂的消费者行为,采取了基于多智能体建模与仿真的方法,通过计算机仿真实现系统分析和优化。仿真结果表明,无视市场上个性化的消费者行为,必然导致决策者的利润流失。进一步分析指出,收益共享机制能够实现协调供应链渠道之间冲突,并实现双赢。研究结论还包括分散决策情景下,制造商占据博弈主导地位对双方而言都是有利的;博弈主导方可以通过信息不对称而获利等。 This paper studies a two-echelon dual-channel supply chain system in which a manufacturer sells a single product to customers through its owned online channel and an independent retailer. In the market, potential customers make their own purchasing decision according to product price on each channel, their preference for each channel--loyalty, and degree of rationality in decision-making process, etc. The main purpose is to analyze how these individuals influence the pricing strategies of supply chain members. Due to complexity of the problem, we use an agent-based modeling approach. The simulation results show that profits of both sides may decrease once the consumer behavior is neglected. The profit sharing mechanism is valid for the coordination of channel conflict. Moreover, the results imply that the manufacturer acting as the leader in Stackelberg game is a better option for the retailer, and the dominant player in the game benefits from information asymmetry.
作者 李锋 魏莹
出处 《系统管理学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第5期762-768,共7页 Journal of Systems & Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71171085) 广东省自然科学基金资助项目(2014A030313262) 华南理工大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金资助项目(2014ZZ0074) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(暨南启明星计划)(15JNQM003)
关键词 消费者行为 供应链协调 双渠道供应链 多智能体建模 consumer behavior supply chain coordination dual-channel supply chain multi-agent modeling
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Ibragimov R, Walden J. Optimal bundling strategies under heavy-tailed valuations [ J ]. Management Science, 2010, 56(11):1963-1976.
  • 2Banerjee A V. A simple model of herd behavior[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1992, 107(3): 797-817.
  • 3Zhang T, Zhang D. Agent-based simulation of consumer purchase decision-making and the decoy effect[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2007, 60 (8) : 912-922.
  • 4Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory.. An analysis of decision under risk [J]. Econometrica, 1979, 47(2): 263-291.
  • 5Basov S. Bounded rationality: Static versus dynamic approaches[J]. Economic Theory, 2005, 25(4): 871 885.
  • 6Li F, Du T C. Who is talking? An ontology-based opinion-leader identification framework for word-of- mouth marketing in online social blogs [J]. Decision Support Systems, 2011, 51: 190-197.
  • 7Wang C X, Webster S. The loss-averse newsvendor problem[J]. OMEGA, 2009, 37(1): 93-105.
  • 8Li F. Impact of reference point on loss-averse newsvendor problem [C]// In Proceedings of The Fourth International Con{erence on Operations and Supply Chain Management, 2010 : 574-578.
  • 9Su X. Bounded rationality in newsvendor models [J]. Manufacturing Service Operations Management, 2008, 10(4): 566-589.
  • 10Mersereau A J, Zhang D. Markdown pricing with unknown fraction of strategic customers [ J ]. Manufacturing l}. Service Operations Management, 2012, 14(3).. 355-370.

同被引文献128

  • 1许民利,向泽华,简惠云.考虑消费者环保意识的WEEE双渠道回收模型[J].控制与决策,2020,35(3):713-720. 被引量:12
  • 2祝帅,郑小林,陈德人.论坛中的意见领袖自动发现算法研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2011,31(S2):7-12. 被引量:17
  • 3李锋,魏莹.消费者理性程度对供应链定价影响的仿真研究[J].系统仿真学报,2015,27(12):2898-2907. 被引量:5
  • 4琚春华,王蓓.新型的网络团购模式:主动式网络团购[J].商业经济与管理,2006(9):9-14. 被引量:46
  • 5Anil Arya, Brian Mittendorf, David E M. Sappington the bright side of supplier encroachment [ J ]. Marketing Science, 2007, 26(5): 651-659.
  • 6Anil Arya, Brian Mittendorf, Dae-Hee Yoon. Friction in related party trade when a rival is also a customer [ J ]. Management Science, 2008, 27 (8) : 1-11.
  • 7Arya A, Lfiffler C, Mittendorf B, Pfeiffer T. The middle- man as panacea for supply chain co0rdination problems [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2015, 240(2) : 393-400.
  • 8Mishra B K, Raghunathan S, Yue X. Demand forecast sharing in supply Chains [ J]. Production & Operations Management, 2009, 18(18) : 152-166.
  • 9Kovtun V, Giloni A, Hurvich C. Assessing the value of demand sharing in supply chains [ J ]. Naval Research Logistics, 2014, 61 (7): 515-531.
  • 10Avi Giloni, Clifford Hurvich, Sridhar Seshadri. Forecas- ting and information sharing in supply chains under ARMA demand[ J]. Lie Transactions, 2014, 46( 1 ) : 35-54.

引证文献15

二级引证文献121

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部