期刊文献+

施氮水平对夏播花生氮素及干物质积累的影响 被引量:10

Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate on Nitrogen and Dry Matter Accumulation in Summer Peanut
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于黄河流域夏播花生种植区两个类型花生品种(豫花15和白沙1016)不同施氮水平进行田间试验,研究夏播花生氮素积累动态,及与花生生产力的关系。结果表明,各施氮水平下,氮素积累动态呈近"S"型曲线;施氮量在120kg/hm2以下,花生植株氮积累量、叶面积指数、叶面积指数持续期、干物质积累量和各生育时期叶片氮浓度均随着施氮量增加而增加,但当施氮量达到和超过120kg/hm2时均出现滞涨;每个施氮水平下,整个叶层平均氮浓度随着生育进程推进均呈下降趋势,但随着施氮量增加氮浓度下降速度趋缓。本研究用叶面积指数持续期拟合的动态曲线较好地区分了不同施氮水平间的差异,该曲线显示,在苗后10℃以上积温归一化值RGDD≤0.5时,夏播花生的叶面积指数持续期呈指数曲线增长;当RGDD>0.5时,呈线性增长。 Summer peanut nitrogen accumulation dynamics and its relationship with peanut pro- ductivity were studied through plot nitrogen fertilizer rate experiment with 2 summer peanut varieties (YH15 and BS1016) in the Yellow River Basin in China. The results showed: nitrogen accumulation of peanut was found as the "S" type curve. While nitrogen fertilizer application amount was less than 120 kg/ha, the peanut plant nitrogen accumulation, leaf area index, dry matter and the leaf nitrogen concentration increased with the increase of nitrogen fertilizer rate, but they showed stagflationary when the nitrogen rate reached over 120 kg/ha. At each level of nitrogen application, the leaf nitrogen concentration decreased with the increasing of the growth process, but decreased gradually with the increase of nitrogen application rate. The LAID dynamic curve could distinguish the peanut growth differences under different nitrogen fertilizer rate. The curves showed that the LAID complied with exponential curve when RGDD≤0.5 and linear growth when RGDD〉0.5.
机构地区 河南科技学院
出处 《花生学报》 北大核心 2015年第3期14-19,27,共7页 Journal of Peanut Science
基金 河南科技学院国家级大学生创新训练计划项目(201310467055)
关键词 夏播花生 氮积累量 叶面积指数 干物质积累 summer peanut nitrogen accumulation leaf area index dry matter accumulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1中国食品科技网.中国食用油供给之危[R/OL].( 2013-4-8 ). http://www, tech-food, com/kndata/ 1051/0102625. htm.
  • 2朱兆良.中国土壤氮素研究[J].土壤学报,2008,45(5):778-783. 被引量:530
  • 3中国农业统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,1999.
  • 4IPPC (Intergovemental Panel on Climate Change). Climate Change 2001: Synthesis Report. A Contri- bution of working Groups I , 11 and HI to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Cambridge [ R]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
  • 5OECD. OECD Environmental Outlook to 2020 [ R]. Paris: OECD, 2001:1-338.
  • 6Iserman K. Territorial, continental and global aspects of C, N, P and S emissions from agricultural ecosys- tems[M].//Wollast R, Mackenzie F T, Chou L. In- teractions of C, N, P and S: Bio geochemical Cycles and Global Change. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1993: 79-121.
  • 7Paoletti M G, Foissner W, Coleman D. Soil Biota,Nutrient Cycling and Farming Systems [ M]. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers. 1993.1-314.
  • 8张翔,张新友,张玉亭,毛家伟,李刘杰.施氮量对不同花生品种生长及干物质积累的影响[J].花生学报,2011,40(1):23-29. 被引量:31
  • 9杨吉顺,李尚霞,张智猛,吴菊香,樊宏.施氮对不同花生品种光合特性及干物质积累的影响[J].核农学报,2014,28(1):154-160. 被引量:60
  • 10苏秋琴,林芸.不同施氮量对花生龙花163的干物质及叶面积积累动态分析[J].农业科技通讯,2013(4):91-92. 被引量:1

二级参考文献128

共引文献775

同被引文献164

引证文献10

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部