期刊文献+

定期尿激酶干预对维持性血液透析患者长期导管的维护 被引量:9

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨定期尿激酶溶栓在尿毒症患者长期导管维护中的疗效。方法选取2008年10月至2014年12月在贵州省人民医院血液透析中心透析时间3~6年、通路均为带cuff管的维持性血液净化患者40例(男21例),平均年龄68.40岁;随机分为2组:定期尿激酶干预组(19例),透析结束时予以行尿激酶干预(盐水4ml+尿激酶20万U注入导管动静脉端,保留半小时后抽出,用5ml生理盐水冲净后,使用普通肝素封管),1次/2周,透析结束时常规予以行普通肝素封管。对照组(21例),透析结束时常规予以行普通肝素封管。观察两组患者透析前后血尿素氮(BUN)、血清肌酐(Scr)、透析量指标(Kt/V)及透析时血流量、静脉压、透析后血浆凝血酶原时间(PT)、活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)等指标的变化。结果两组患者治疗前血流量、静脉压、BUN、Scr、PT及APTT比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者治疗后,尿激酶定期干预组静脉压为(68.0±30.5)mmHg,BUN为(7.2±3.7)mmol/L,Scr为200.5(89.2,325.1)μmol/L,下降较对照组明显(P<0.05);C-反应蛋白(CRP)经干预后与对照组相比明显减低;而血流量、Kt/V较对照组明显上升,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者治疗后PT、APTT比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者在治疗后,尿激酶溶栓组形成血栓有2例,占11%;对照组有10例,占47%。两组在干预治疗后,出血差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论定期尿激酶溶栓可提高患者透析质量,减少导管血栓形成延长导管使用寿命。
出处 《中华临床医师杂志(电子版)》 CAS 2015年第17期108-110,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition)
基金 国家自然科学基金(81200539) 国际科技合作计划项目(黔科合外G字[2012]7045号) 贵州省科技厅基金(黔科合LS字[2012]033号) 贵州省卫计委基金(gzwkj2014-1-046)
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1van Miert C, Hill R, Jones L. Interventions for restoring patency of occluded central venous catheter lumens (review)[J]. Evid Based Child Health, 2013, 8(2): 695-749.
  • 2Park CK Paes BA, Nagel K, et al. Thrombosis and Hemostasis in Newborns (THIN) Group. Neonatal: diagnosis, management and outcome[J]. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis, 2014, 25(2): 97-106.
  • 3Mitchell MD, Anderson BJ, Williams K, et al. Heparin flushing and other interventions to maintain patency of central venous catheters: a systematic review[J]. J Adv Nuts, 2009, 165(10): 200%2021.
  • 4Pelayo Alonso 1L Cobo Sfiachez JL, de Buruaga Perea AS, et al. Comparative study between 20 IU/ml heparin and 5% heparin/urokinase 5 000 IU lock in hemodialysis central venous catheters with permeability problems[J]. Rev Enferm, 2013, 36(3): 8-12.
  • 5Hammes M, Desai A, Pasupneti S, et al. Central venous catheters: incidence and predictive factors of venous thrombosis[J]. Clin Nephrol, 2015, 84(7): 21-28.
  • 6POwer A, Duncan N, Singh SK, et al. Sodium citrate versus heparin catheter locks for cuffed central venous catheters: a single-center randomized controlled trial[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2009, 53(6): 1034-1041.
  • 7Lersch CH. Prevention of catheter-induced thromboses by low molecular weight heparins.[J] Hamostaseologie, 2002, 22(4): 161-166.
  • 8Dal Molin A, AUara E, Montani D, et al. Flushing the central venous catheter: is heparin necessary?[J]. J Vase Access, 2014, 15(4): 241-248.
  • 9Cortejoso L, Manrique-Rodrigocz S, Fernimdez-Llamazares CM, et al. Treamaent and prophylaxis of catheter-related thromboernbolic events in children[J]. J Pharm Pharm Sci, 2012, 15(5): 632-641.
  • 10Chert FK Li JJ, Song Y, et al. Concentrated sodium chloride catheter lock solution--a new effective alternative method for hemodialysis patients with high bleeding risk[J]. Ren Fail, 2014, 36(1): 17-22.

二级参考文献11

  • 1van Miert C, Hill R, Jones L. Interventions for restoring patency of occluded central venous catheter lumens (review)[J]. Evid Based Child Health, 2013, 8(2): 695-749.
  • 2Park CK Paes BA, Nagel K, et al. Thrombosis and Hemostasis in Newborns (THIN) Group. Neonatal: diagnosis, management and outcome[J]. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis, 2014, 25(2): 97-106.
  • 3Mitchell MD, Anderson BJ, Williams K, et al. Heparin flushing and other interventions to maintain patency of central venous catheters: a systematic review[J]. J Adv Nuts, 2009, 165(10): 200%2021.
  • 4Pelayo Alonso 1L Cobo Sfiachez JL, de Buruaga Perea AS, et al. Comparative study between 20 IU/ml heparin and 5% heparin/urokinase 5 000 IU lock in hemodialysis central venous catheters with permeability problems[J]. Rev Enferm, 2013, 36(3): 8-12.
  • 5Hammes M, Desai A, Pasupneti S, et al. Central venous catheters: incidence and predictive factors of venous thrombosis[J]. Clin Nephrol, 2015, 84(7): 21-28.
  • 6POwer A, Duncan N, Singh SK, et al. Sodium citrate versus heparin catheter locks for cuffed central venous catheters: a single-center randomized controlled trial[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2009, 53(6): 1034-1041.
  • 7Lersch CH. Prevention of catheter-induced thromboses by low molecular weight heparins.[J] Hamostaseologie, 2002, 22(4): 161-166.
  • 8Dal Molin A, AUara E, Montani D, et al. Flushing the central venous catheter: is heparin necessary?[J]. J Vase Access, 2014, 15(4): 241-248.
  • 9Cortejoso L, Manrique-Rodrigocz S, Fernimdez-Llamazares CM, et al. Treamaent and prophylaxis of catheter-related thromboernbolic events in children[J]. J Pharm Pharm Sci, 2012, 15(5): 632-641.
  • 10Chert FK Li JJ, Song Y, et al. Concentrated sodium chloride catheter lock solution--a new effective alternative method for hemodialysis patients with high bleeding risk[J]. Ren Fail, 2014, 36(1): 17-22.

共引文献8

同被引文献60

引证文献9

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部