摘要
《刑法修正案(八)》对入户盗窃的规定导致盗窃罪的构成要件发生重大变化,进而引起该罪诸多方面的多米诺骨牌效应,并引起盗窃罪在行为类型、犯罪既遂形态等方面的纷争。入户盗窃行为是行为人以盗窃等非法目的,未经同意而非法进入供他人家庭生活并与外界相对隔离的处所进行盗窃的行为;入户盗窃归罪并不改变盗窃罪作为结果犯的犯罪既遂形态。
The criminal constitution of burglary has changed drastically due to the criminal law amendment (eight). Like the first fallen one among the dominoes, the change impacts the behavior type, accomplished criterion. the entering household theft is the behavior a person with illegal purposes and so on, entering the house without the consent , which is relatively isolated, used to live for family, to steal something protected by criminal law; Burglary does not change the attribute that theft is a kind of consequential offence.
出处
《河南司法警官职业学院学报》
2015年第3期64-67,共4页
Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College
关键词
入户盗窃
入户行为
既遂
司法适用
burglary
entering household behavior
criterion for accomplished crime
judicial application