摘要
目的:评估超声引导下单点胸椎旁神经阻滞(single-injection thoracic panavertebral block,TPVB)联合静脉自控镇痛(patient-controlled intravenous analgesia,PCIA)对胸科手术患者术后镇痛效果。方法:将90例美国麻醉医师协会(American Society of Anesthesiologists,ASA)分级Ⅰ~Ⅱ级胸科手术患者术后随机分为行TPVB联合PCIA组(观察组)和行PCIA组(对照组),各45例。观察、记录比较术后1、12、24、48 h患者的视觉模拟评分(VAS评分)、Ramsay镇静评分以及恶心(呕吐)、皮肤瘙痒、胸闷的发生情况及恶心呕吐评分。结果:观察组患者在静止和咳嗽状态各个时间点VAS评分均显著低于对照组(P〈0.05);2组患者镇静评分差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);观察组患者手术后恶心、呕吐的发生率明显低于对照组(P〈0.05),同时恶心、呕吐评分明显低于对照组(P〈0.05)。结论:TPVB联合PCIA可以明显缓解开胸手术术后的疼痛刺激,有利于患者肺部功能的恢复和基础疾病的治疗效果的改善,同时可以明显降低并发症的发生率。
Objective: To compare the effect of single-injection thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) guided by ultrasound com- bined with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) on postoperative analgesia after thoracic surgery. Methods: A total of 90 patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)Ⅰ -Ⅱ , undergoing thoracic surgery were divided into observation group and control group random]y, 45 patients in each. The observation group received TPVB combined with PCIA and the control group re- ceived PCIA. The pain grade was evaluated with visual analogue scale (VAS) and Ramsay score at 1, 12, 24, 48 hafler operation were compared. Results: The VAS score in the rest and coughs in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the con- trol group (P〈0. 05). There was no significant difference in sedation scores in the two groups (P〉0. 05). The rate of nausea, vom- iting in the observation group were significantly lower than that in the control group ( P〈0. 05) and the score of nausea and vomiting in the obse~'vatiou group was lower than that in the control group ( P〈0.05 ). Conclusions : TPVB guided by ultrasound combined with PCIA is a better analgesic method than only PCIA.
出处
《沈阳医学院学报》
2015年第3期136-138,151,共4页
Journal of Shenyang Medical College