期刊文献+

基于持续关注度衰减的重要论文预测 被引量:2

Citation Prediction Based on Sustained Attention Decay
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对现有方法存在预测精度较低或者计算复杂等问题,通过真实数据集的实证分析,发现论文的年均引用次数与论文未来的被引次数有很大的相关性,由此提出持续关注度的概念。进一步,结合论文引用的时间衰减特性,提出一种基于持续关注度衰减的重要论文预测算法。在两个典型数据集上的实验结果表明,该方法不仅计算简单,而且具有较高的预测精度。 Existing methods have problems such as low accuracy or time consuming. Through em- pirical analysis of real data sets, we find that there is a strong correlation between future citations and annual citation of papers, i.e. the sustained attention; meanwhile, the future citations have apparent characteristics of time decay. Thus we put forward a method based on sustained atten- tion decay to predict the future citations of papers, and then to find papers of potential importance with these results. Experimental results on two benchmark data sets show that the proposed method can predict precisely with lower time complexity.
出处 《复杂系统与复杂性科学》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第3期77-84,共8页 Complex Systems and Complexity Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(61370150) 四川省科技厅项目(2012FZ0120)
关键词 持续关注度 时间衰减 论文引用 预测 sustained attention time decay citation prediction
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Wang D, Song C, Barabdsi A L. Quantifying long-term scientific impact[J]. Science, 2013, 342(6154): 127 -132.
  • 2Hirseh J E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output[J]. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(46) : 16569 - 16572.
  • 3Egghe L. Theory and practise of the g-index[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 69(1): 131 -152.
  • 4Ding Y, Yan E, Frazho A, et al. PageRank for ranking authors in co-citation networks[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Sci- ence and Technology, 2009, 60(11): 2229 -2243.
  • 5Liu X, Bollen J, Nelson M L, et al. Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community[J]. Information Processing Manage- ment, 2005, 41(6): 1462-1480.
  • 6Medo M, Cimini G, Gualdi S. Temporal effects in the growth of networks[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2011, 107(23) : 238701.
  • 7Berberich K, Vazirgiannis M, Weikum G. Time-aware authority ranking[J]. Internet Mathematics, 2005, 2(3) 301-332.
  • 8Walker D, Xie H, Yan K K, et al. Ranking scientific publications using a model of network traffic[J]. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2007, 2007(06): P06010.
  • 9Zhou Y B, Lti L, Li M. Quantifying the influence of scientists and their publications: distinguishing between prestige and popularity[J]. New Journal of Physics, 2012, 14(3): 033033.
  • 10Yan E, Ding Y, Sugimoto C R. P-Rank an indicator measuring prestige in heterogeneous scholarly networks[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62(3): 467 -477.

同被引文献10

引证文献2

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部